>Implying I'm mad when nothing about my post indicates such a thing
>Implying I'm bad at Reach aka the second easiest Halo to be "good" at
>Implying that 'sager was even good when he was just another Banshee whore
Sorry, please try again.
Calling someone a no-life clearly shows you are mad. Sager was good he had multiple single digit onyx and multiple 50s in h3. Link stats or stay mad brig.
>Implying I ever said I was "so good"
I said that Reach is the second easiest Halo, not that I was some 420 blaze and praise 1080 no scope player.
Game over. Continue?
[spoiler]Also, asking for my gt to judge muh statz? Top f[u]u[/u]cking kek man, you must think that you [i]really[/i] are on the Reach forums...[/spoiler]
Did I explicitly say he's bad? No, I didn't. He did very well at being a Banshee whore I have to admit, but imo a supposedly [i]good[/i] player doesn't need a ridiculously op vehicle to do as well as he did.
Sorry, you are not an instant winner. Please try again tomorrow.
Your role as a moderator enables you immediately ban this user from messaging (bypassing the report queue) if you select a punishment.
7 Day Ban
7 Day Ban
30 Day Ban
Permanent Ban
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
close
Our policies have recently changed. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
Our policies have recently changed. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.