{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Soatok:
10/26/2019 5:36:49 AM
71
Gambit without Invasions (or any PvP at all) would be perfection
Seriously: A non-PvP Gambit mode which consists [i]entirely[/i] of competitive PVE (who can get the primeval summoned and burned quicker?) would be so much more pleasant than what we have today.
It would give dedicated PVE players a chance to compete in gear races without having to suffer through PvP.
EDIT: Since this has caused a tiny bit of confusion...
I'm not saying "change Gambit for everyone". I'm saying a "no invader" mode should be a valid option for PVE players who want powerful rewards during week one of a season and are otherwise forced to do PVP.
Ideally, you should be able to do endgame PVE without ever having touched a PVP mode in your life.
Cooperative > Competitive
-
2 Replies[quote]Seriously: A non-PvP Gambit mode which consists [i]entirely[/i] of competitive PVE (who can get the primeval summoned and burned quicker?) would be so much more pleasant than what we have today. It would give dedicated PVE players a chance to compete in gear races without having to suffer through PvP.[/quote] To be very honest, if there was no Invading then Gambit would be pointless! I understand the frustration that invasion causes but it needs to remain there. If you want simply a horde mode, cause that’s what it would be, then there is already options there. In my opinion, it is the frequency of invasion that is needed and there has to be a risk element from invading. If you invade and die, it doesn’t affect you or your team at all - but if you invade and kill someone with motes then that affects the opposition- there needs to be a balance.
