Im trying to decide which one to start first, because depending on the one you beat, you get a code and can alter the other game. i feel like no one hete has played those two games, so that's ok
Edit: Surprised there's a good bit of people to be honest, anyways i started with Seasons
English
#Gaming
-
Was seasons the one on gameboy where you could summon a kangaroo, a bear and something else with your flute? I remember enjoying the hell out of it as a kid.
-
Got Seasons from my friend long ago as a birthday gift. It’s actually the only Zelda game I’ve ever played through. Wish I had Ages to do the code thing with, but never did get it.
-
They're both better than horizon zero dawn tbh
-
Edited by Seraph: 10/13/2017 8:34:15 PMI’ve played both. I’ve beaten Seasons, I got stuck on Ages due to a rhythm mini game that I could not get past. It doesn’t matter which one you play first so feel free to start where ever you want. Seasons is considered to be more action oriented whereas Ages is considered to be more puzzle oriented so bear that in mind.
-
I've played both and I vote starting with seasons. It just more seems like the better one to start with.
-
Nope, I've only played the first 1-2 hours of ocarina, 1/4-1/2 of majora, a bit of 4 swords, 1-2 hours of windwaker and all skyward sword.
-
Seasons is probably the easier game. The time changing puzzles and colored tile puzzles really confused younger me in Ages.
-
Edited by The Boss Harmony: 10/12/2017 12:57:51 PMThe code you get for completing one game doesn't alter the other too much so it doesn't really matter with which one you start. Seasons is more action-oriented and Ages focuses more on puzzles so just pick what you like better, both are great games. I played Seasons first.
-
I played Seasons first, it was actually my first Zelda game. Not a bad way to be introduced to the series, if you ask me
-
If you like puzzles, go with ages. But if you prefer active fighting, seasons might appeal to you more. I played Ages first and have no regrets.