JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
Edited by Sapid: 2/17/2016 4:49:29 PM
85
53
Sapid

Apple's public letter, FBI order denied

[url]http://www.apple.com/customer-letter/[/url] [quote]February 16, 2016 A Message to Our Customers The United States government has demanded that Apple take an unprecedented step which threatens the security of our customers. We oppose this order, which has implications far beyond the legal case at hand. This moment calls for public discussion, and we want our customers and people around the country to understand what is at stake. The Need for Encryption Smartphones, led by iPhone, have become an essential part of our lives. People use them to store an incredible amount of personal information, from our private conversations to our photos, our music, our notes, our calendars and contacts, our financial information and health data, even where we have been and where we are going. All that information needs to be protected from hackers and criminals who want to access it, steal it, and use it without our knowledge or permission. Customers expect Apple and other technology companies to do everything in our power to protect their personal information, and at Apple we are deeply committed to safeguarding their data. Compromising the security of our personal information can ultimately put our personal safety at risk. That is why encryption has become so important to all of us. For many years, we have used encryption to protect our customers’ personal data because we believe it’s the only way to keep their information safe. We have even put that data out of our own reach, because we believe the contents of your iPhone are none of our business. The San Bernardino Case We were shocked and outraged by the deadly act of terrorism in San Bernardino last December. We mourn the loss of life and want justice for all those whose lives were affected. The FBI asked us for help in the days following the attack, and we have worked hard to support the government’s efforts to solve this horrible crime. We have no sympathy for terrorists. When the FBI has requested data that’s in our possession, we have provided it. Apple complies with valid subpoenas and search warrants, as we have in the San Bernardino case. We have also made Apple engineers available to advise the FBI, and we’ve offered our best ideas on a number of investigative options at their disposal. We have great respect for the professionals at the FBI, and we believe their intentions are good. Up to this point, we have done everything that is both within our power and within the law to help them. But now the U.S. government has asked us for something we simply do not have, and something we consider too dangerous to create. They have asked us to build a backdoor to the iPhone. Specifically, the FBI wants us to make a new version of the iPhone operating system, circumventing several important security features, and install it on an iPhone recovered during the investigation. In the wrong hands, this software — which does not exist today — would have the potential to unlock any iPhone in someone’s physical possession. The FBI may use different words to describe this tool, but make no mistake: Building a version of iOS that bypasses security in this way would undeniably create a backdoor. And while the government may argue that its use would be limited to this case, there is no way to guarantee such control. The Threat to Data Security Some would argue that building a backdoor for just one iPhone is a simple, clean-cut solution. But it ignores both the basics of digital security and the significance of what the government is demanding in this case. In today’s digital world, the “key” to an encrypted system is a piece of information that unlocks the data, and it is only as secure as the protections around it. Once the information is known, or a way to bypass the code is revealed, the encryption can be defeated by anyone with that knowledge. The government suggests this tool could only be used once, on one phone. But that’s simply not true. Once created, the technique could be used over and over again, on any number of devices. In the physical world, it would be the equivalent of a master key, capable of opening hundreds of millions of locks — from restaurants and banks to stores and homes. No reasonable person would find that acceptable. The government is asking Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security advancements that protect our customers — including tens of millions of American citizens — from sophisticated hackers and cybercriminals. The same engineers who built strong encryption into the iPhone to protect our users would, ironically, be ordered to weaken those protections and make our users less safe. We can find no precedent for an American company being forced to expose its customers to a greater risk of attack. For years, cryptologists and national security experts have been warning against weakening encryption. Doing so would hurt only the well-meaning and law-abiding citizens who rely on companies like Apple to protect their data. Criminals and bad actors will still encrypt, using tools that are readily available to them. A Dangerous Precedent Rather than asking for legislative action through Congress, the FBI is proposing an unprecedented use of the All Writs Act of 1789 to justify an expansion of its authority. The government would have us remove security features and add new capabilities to the operating system, allowing a passcode to be input electronically. This would make it easier to unlock an iPhone by “brute force,” trying thousands or millions of combinations with the speed of a modern computer. The implications of the government’s demands are chilling. If the government can use the All Writs Act to make it easier to unlock your iPhone, it would have the power to reach into anyone’s device to capture their data. The government could extend this breach of privacy and demand that Apple build surveillance software to intercept your messages, access your health records or financial data, track your location, or even access your phone’s microphone or camera without your knowledge. Opposing this order is not something we take lightly. We feel we must speak up in the face of what we see as an overreach by the U.S. government. We are challenging the FBI’s demands with the deepest respect for American democracy and a love of our country. We believe it would be in the best interest of everyone to step back and consider the implications. While we believe the FBI’s intentions are good, it would be wrong for the government to force us to build a backdoor into our products. And ultimately, we fear that this demand would undermine the very freedoms and liberty our government is meant to protect. Tim Cook[/quote] I don't think the FBI will get Apple to decrypt anything now that they went public. Good for them. TL;DR Apple denied the FBI's request to create a backdoor into iOS.

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I find it hard to believe that the [b][u]US government[/u][/b] can't hack an iPhone.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    13 Replies
    • Good on Apple

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    • Apple is no match for the federal government, unfortunately. Nothing is.

      Posting in language:

       

      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

      4 Replies
      • yep

        Posting in language:

         

        Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

      • Yay for not being dickheads Apple

        Posting in language:

         

        Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

      • 5
        Apple denied them. Fuсk yeah! People might look at this and say that it's unpatriotic or that it's what's best for national security but there will come a day when they realize that what companies like Apple are doing is what's best for the world.

        Posting in language:

         

        Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

      • I support Apple in this.

        Posting in language:

         

        Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

      • Good for Apple. I hope Google and Microsoft follow suit.

        Posting in language:

         

        Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

      • Edited by NMDurham: 2/17/2016 9:31:16 PM
        And people say Apple's all about the money. What they've done is a VERY good thing and possibly prevented the first 'cyber war'. I stand behind them 100%.

        Posting in language:

         

        Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

        1 Reply
        • Who cares about privacy, I'm not doing anything wrong They see my nudes that's [i]their[/i] problem

          Posting in language:

           

          Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

          3 Replies
          • Darn, a back door like that could be really fun to exploit. [spoiler]Disclaimer: Falchion™ does not condone participation in illegal activities.[/spoiler]

            Posting in language:

             

            Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

            1 Reply
            • Amendment 4: no unreasonable searches or seizures. No searches without a warrant.

              Posting in language:

               

              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

            • Did someone say backdoor? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) But seriously, good guy... apple? Thank god some companies care about the consumer's privacy

              Posting in language:

               

              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

            • Here's the TL:DR version of Apple's response, in pirate.

              Posting in language:

               

              Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

              7 Replies
              • Inb4 Trump promised mandatory back door for iOS if he's elected so the sheeple fork over their freedom for security.

                Posting in language:

                 

                Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

              • Edited by CrazyLincoln: 2/18/2016 12:08:55 AM
                Good. If you create a backdoor for the FBI you have also created a backdoor for everybody with the know how to use it. Which includes many different groups you probably wouldn't want to have access, such as governments, hackers, XDC, and so on

                Posting in language:

                 

                Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                6 Replies
                • I never liked apple but outright refusing the FBI's request.. Even I have to respect that.

                  Posting in language:

                   

                  Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                  2 Replies
                  • I already have all the data encrypted on all my devices. However this would be a disastrous breach of privacy! I have held several jobs as a coder, and I can say that there is no way this would not spiral into; every chump on YouTube and every script kitty being able to use this proposed Backdoor, to wreak havoc with ignorance and a lack of computer skills that could potentially cause deep damage to a Strangers device.

                    Posting in language:

                     

                    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                    2 Replies
                    • I find it more disheartening that many politicians are calling Apple out on this. Thank you Apple for trying to maintain the people's privacy.

                      Posting in language:

                       

                      Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                      1 Reply
                      • Dear 2nd Amendment fans, lovers, and followers: Hi, how are you? You're probably wondering, who are you and why are you talking like you're writing a letter right now? Well, gun people, I am the 4th Amendment and I'm writing to you because I - no, [i]we[/i] - need your help. We all know how much you love your right to keep and bear arms. We've all seen how aggressively you will rally against any perceived incursion by the government on said right. Even in the immediate aftermath of a shooting like the one in San Bernardino, you will not only fight any proposed restrictions, you will line up to buy more guns and ammo the next day. But I'm not here to talk about how much you love your guns, I'm here to ask you to split that power and fervor with me, your right to be protected from unfair search and seizure and your implied right to privacy. With requests like the one Apple is being asked to do, we give up more and more of our fundamental rights all the time. The government is mass collecting our data. Secret courts allow them to search it almost with impunity, and with no significant results, either. Yet the feds have somehow convinced themselves that they're on the right path by collecting more and more of our information. And now they want companies to create mechanisms to break through some of the last walls between us and them. But we can fight this - by using the same energy that we use to protect our right to bear arms. If people who want their personal info to stay safe and secure fought intrusion with the same energy that people who fight to keep their firearms unregulated do, we would be a very privacy-orientated nation. The problem is that while gun regulations are highly visible and simple to grasp (you can/can't have whatever firearm/ accessory /ammo it may be), the government can operate in secret when it comes to privacy. They can subpoena records from the companies that hold them for years, under the guise that those records technically aren't "yours" (although they should be). Ironically, the courts that allow them to do this are secret, because privacy is important when it's them and not you. So what do you say, 2nd Amendment followers? Can we share some of the power and influence you hold? And before you answer, consider that being able to access more of your personal data means being able to better keep track of who owns what firearms. Ever taken a picture of your guns with your phone? Ever call your local gun range or text your shooting buddies? That's more data up for grabs - unless you help me, too. That's all for now. Sincerely yours (albeit feeling a bit unappreciated at the moment) The 4th Amendment

                        Posting in language:

                         

                        Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                        3 Replies
                        • 0
                          They should open it! What's more important, national security or a possible breach in your privacy

                          Posting in language:

                           

                          Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                          48 Replies
                          • Edited by Slimbingi: 2/19/2016 3:32:21 PM
                            [i]Democracy is non-negotiable![/i] -Liberty Prime [spoiler]So go apple I guess.[/spoiler]

                            Posting in language:

                             

                            Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                          • Go apple Security < Freedom

                            Posting in language:

                             

                            Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                          • I dislike Apple, but damn that company has guts.

                            Posting in language:

                             

                            Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                          • Bump

                            Posting in language:

                             

                            Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                          • Inb4 CIA create Corvus to monitor people's devices.

                            Posting in language:

                             

                            Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

                          You are not allowed to view this content.
                          ;
                          preload icon
                          preload icon
                          preload icon