Is anyone else disappointed that the PVP limit on players is 12? After playing BF4, anything less than 12v12 seems very last gen and slow paced. Even killzone had 24 player matches. At the very least have a big team battle game type like in Halo. While 3v3 and 6v6 can be fun and challenging, sometimes its just fun to jump into chaos and see who comes out on top. Anyone else agree?
Some of you guys seem to think I'm comparing BF4 and Destiny directly. I'm merely using it as an example. I do not want 64 player matches. I do not think every map should allow 24 players. All I'm asking for is a couple maps that [b]can[/b] support 24ish players. Such as, Halos big team battles did. Or even CODs Big team deathmatch.
English
#Destiny
-
It doesn't need changing. Map size fits perfectly with the number of players so why change it?
-
Edited by Play Pretend: 8/10/2014 2:39:37 PMI like the 6v6 more arena feel. Personally I hate large player count pvp.
-
I like the smaller count. It allows for a more intimate experience
-
[quote]Is anyone else disappointed that the PVP limit on players is 12? After playing BF4, anything less than 12v12 seems very last gen and slow paced. Even killzone had 24 player matches. At the very least have a big team battle game type like in Halo. While 3v3 and 6v6 can be fun and challenging, sometimes its just fun to jump into chaos and see who comes out on top. Anyone else agree?[/quote] Agree
-
We haven't seen all the game modes there will be more than control, I'm guessing you know this, and this isn't made by EA or Guerrilla Games this is being made by activision and if you haven't noticed it seems like activision is heading up the multiplayer seeing as CoD is mostly know for their multiplayer
-
I'd prefer real pvp, not this arena garbage.
-
Game doesn't have the size maps to work with anything more than 6v6 at the moment. Maybe in the future but I still don't see it. Would be nice though I suppose.
-
It's not all about the numbers. You can have awesome games with fewer people too.