JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

7/9/2014 6:04:19 PM
5
[quote]That's right. For those of you who do not know any better, let me say that again. Microsoft owned Halo. In 2007 when Bungie became an independent company, people say Bungie gave away the rights to Halo. This is a misconception. Bungie never owned Halo since they were bought by Microsoft. Microsoft has owned Halo for well over a decade now. Therefore regardless of how Bungie wished to expand or publicize, it was Microsoft's choice. [/quote] Let me start right here. Yes Microsoft owned the rights to Halo when they owned Bungie, however when Bungie split from Microsoft they no longer owned the rights to Halo. Which is why Bungie sold their rights to Halo to 343. A Company that is owned by Microsoft. Now lets not sit here and act like Microsoft never did anything wrong during their time with Bungie. [quote]Yikes, sounds like there’s some bad blood between Halo Wars dev team “Ensemble Studios”, Microsoft, and Bungie: “Microsoft was pretty risk averse and they said, ‘I don’t know if we want to take the risk of creating strategy games on a console. We’d feel better if Halo were attached to it.’ The difficult part of that was it took the game back about a year in development, and I think it never quite turned out the same. They just said, ‘Why don’t you just paint over what you have with Halo stuff?’ But things aren’t quite that simple,” – Ensemble founder Tony Goodman Apparently Microsoft wasn’t the only one putting pressure on the former Age of Empires developer though… “Another problem was that Bungie was never up for it… Bungie was kind of sore about the idea. What they called it was ‘the whoring out of our franchise’ or something. Yeah, that didn’t create a great relationship between us and Bungie; they viewed us as someone infringing [on their franchise],” Unfortunately Ensemble isn’t around anymore and Goodman has moved onto better things, but he still claims that Halo Wars is a grossly underrated product. Here’s to hoping that Microsoft doesn’t pressure developers like this in the future…[/quote] Wow look at that, Microsoft made Bungie do something that they didn't want to do. Who would have guessed right. You need to stop being so melodramatic my friend. [quote] So now. We are in 2013, and we have emerged from the darkness. I came to this website every single day during the darkness. This is because I was loyal to Bungie, I felt valued, loved the community, and couldn't wait to see what would come out next. Throughout the darkness, those of us here were promised time and time again that we would not be forgotten, that we would be 'rewarded' for staying here. 'Rewarded' for being good members of the community and sticking it through to the end. We would be 'rewarded' for being test subjects of the new forums. [/quote] You supported Bungie on a console that they had to use to develop their games becasue they were not allowed to work on any other console becasue of Microsoft. You didn't support Bungie, you supported Microsoft becasue at the time Halo was made Bungie was still part of Microsoft. Bungie didn't become it's own entity until they split from Microsoft back in 2007. So this talk about being loyal to Bungie is nothing more then you being over dramatic. You told me in another thread that Bungie sold there right to Halo becasue they wanted to work on another game and that they didn't want to work on another Halo. Ok I see that and I have this Quote for you. [quote]"We've been working on this game since well before Halo Reach shipped," Bungie's Chris Butcher tells Wired.co.uk. "We kicked off in 2009 and we'd already been working on it for more than a year," adds Bungie COO Pete Parsons, "and many of the ideas we have go back to 2002." [/quote] So Bungie has been working on Destiny since before Reach and the idea has been tossed around since before Halo 2. If Bungie really wanted to work on their own thing then why didn't they sale their rights to Halo once they split up with Microsoft. The fact that they made Reach showed that Bungie did have a desire to make more Halo games they just wanted to make other games, but apparently Microsoft didn't like that idea. [quote]You know that big ol BILLION dollar franchise Bungie has created for Microsoft, to show their appreciate Microsoft is letting Bungie leave. Of course Microsoft gets to keep all rights to the Halo franchise, but as today Bungie no longer part of Microsoft. Ask anyone who works there to search the global address book, they’re no longer in there. Microsoft was supposed to release the press release today but if they wait till the 10/6 the impact wont effect the quarterly results. However today is the actual official date and the day the NDAs expire, however you still didn’t hear this from me. Apparently MS just wants Bungie to make Halo for the rest of their natural days, and Bungie doesn’t like how MS is constantly trying to “handle” everything they do; the way they market their games, the way they interact with their fans (basically the fact that they do appreciate their fans), and how stingie they are with the profits (comparable to the rest of the industry). So as of today they are their own independent entity. They’ll probably make Halo 4 for Microsoft, however hey are also free to create new intellectual properties for whatever system they want. (Even though they prefer the xbox platform) What a way to say thank you. [/quote] But let's get to the heart of the argument. You already should know why Bungie announced Destiny on the PS4 and it has something to do with this. [quote]Destiny developer Bungie and Sony have been doing business together longer than you think. Also, we have learned just how long Destiny’s PlayStation-only content will remain exclusive. According to TechRadar, Bungie, the company behind Destiny and creators of the original Halo series, have been working with Sony for quite some time. Bungie originally broke a longtime partnership with Microsoft back in 2007 after the release of Halo 3. As per their closing arrangements, Bungie went on to make Halo 3: ODST and Halo: Reach. After closing its chapters in the Halo series, Bungie has gone on to make Destiny, and has been working closely with Sony ever since, despite plans for the game’s multi-console release. In a shocking twist, we have learned that Bungie helped Sony develop its DualShock 4 controller for the PlayStation 4.[/quote] That's right Bungie was allowed to help Sony in their development of the PS4 controller. Not to mention that Bungie and Sony has agreed to a partnership and you wonder why Bungie is showing off the PS4. It's becasue that's what Sony paid them to do. [quote]And now we have the Beta. The Beta received for preordering Destiny... huh. Bnet, did you know that at 0900 last Spring I waited outside of my Gamestop for it to open so I could preorder the game? I have little doubt I was the first person in the midwest to preorder it. I told the cashier I wanted to preorder this game. He said he never heard of it. I looked at my watch and told him it was a game that was going to be announced in around an hour or two, but since it's in their systems I wanted to preorder it. He looked it up and there it was. He claimed they didn't have the poster. So I walked back to my apartment- a 30 minute walk one way, by the way, and they called me back saying they did have them. So I walked back, got it, and back home again. All in all, it was around a 2 1/2 hour adventure... just because of how excited I was. I'm actually known at the store as the Destiny guy, now, because I answer questions for the guys working there about it and the likes. They recognize me, even. My friends make fun because of how I talk about the game, wear the shirt, etc. [/quote] You do understand that you we only guaranteed the beta with your preorder. Your beta length wasn't guaranteed. You are starting to sound like the split screen guys now and I know that not who you are. Again Bungie doesn't have to give us the beta to begin with and the only reason why the Playstation is getting more days is becasue Sony paid for it. It's just like how Microsoft paid Activision for the Call of Duty DLCs. Now I know that this isn't Call of Duty but the premise remains the same. Companies like Microsoft and Sony give money to game developers so they can have exclusives. That's something that I personally do not like but it's something that is apart of business. [quote]Due to the fact that I have been with Bungie for 12 years; due to the fact that I followed them and got an Xbox 360 largely to stay with them because I felt the company valued its community as a whole; and due to the fact that I became so engrossed in this community that it became a part of my REAL life as well... I am told that I don't matter. This is a turn from the early years. When Bungie moved from the computer to the Xbox, it was due to needing superior hardware and because Halo was no longer their property- they merely developed it. But Bungie is independent now. They chose to enter these deals with Activision and Sony. They chose to tell their most loyal fanbase that it needs to sit down and be quiet. And this goes against everything Bungie has stood for over the past decade.[/quote] Dude lets be real here. You weren't loyal to Bungie when the first Halo came out, you were loyal to Halo which you said was owned by Microsoft. We all became loyal to Bungie in 2007 when they became their own independent company. That's the truth of the matter. And while I'm not questioning your loyalty I will ask you why the hell are you mad. I would understand if you weren't getting to play this game but that's not the case here. Bungie is making it for the Xbox, you will be able to play this game on your console.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]Which is why Bungie sold their rights to Halo to 343. A Company that is owned by Microsoft.[/quote]Bungie did not 'sell' the rights to Halo to 343 in the terms people are stating it as. Microsoft purchased Bungie because Bungie did not have the financial resources to create the Halo project, so Bungie allowed themselves to be purchased in order to exist at all. When they were purchased, they owned everything Bungie. That means Microsoft owned Halo since 2000- a year before Halo: CE even came out. Ten years before 343 existed. Bungie did not 'sell' Halo to 343. Bungie simply got their independence from Microsoft and Halo remained owned by the same people that always owned it. [quote] Now lets not sit here and act like Microsoft never did anything wrong during their time with Bungie.[/quote]I'm going to ignore this entire section because it's not something I dispute. Microsoft did a number of things Bungie did not like. My personal favorite example is the announcement of Halo 3: Recon and the price attached to the game. Bungie was forced to cancel their announcement after a week long countdown because MS didn't want it to come out yet. That was horrible. MS also made ODST $60 after Bungie came out and said it would be far less. That sucked, too. It was a shame that Bungie was owned by Microsoft during those times. Luckily Bungie was community oriented at the time and flat out apologized for the announcement fiasco, and included the Halo 3: Mythic disk with ODST in order to make the title more worth of the ridiculous cost- which they did well. [quote] You supported Bungie on a console that they had to use to develop their games becasue they were not allowed to work on any other console becasue of Microsoft. You didn't support Bungie, you supported Microsoft becasue at the time Halo was made Bungie was still part of Microsoft. [/quote] I supported Bungie because they made a game and, more importantly, a community that I could play and be highly involved in. It was not a support of Microsoft- it was a support of Bungie. Microsoft was often seen as the evil overseer. I certainly had no love for them, nor do I have much attachment to them now. It's the product I enjoy, not the company. And that makes all the difference considering it's both the product and the company I, and many, love with Bungie. [quote] You told me in another thread that Bungie sold there right to Halo becasue they wanted to work on another game and that they didn't want to work on another Halo.[/quote]I never said that. Bungie didn't sell Halo at any point. However, they did obtain their right to be employee owned in 2007 because they wanted to work on other projects. [quote] So Bungie has been working on Destiny since before Reach and the idea has been tossed around since before Halo 2.[/quote]It's not relevant to the argument but I wanted to clarify just as a fun fact- Destiny began conceptual development in 2008. The 2002 thing is not referring to Destiny, it's referring to concepts they wanted to use in their games that they didn't. It's not as if they were reserving it for Destiny. [quote]If Bungie really wanted to work on their own thing then why didn't they sale their rights to Halo once they split up with Microsoft. The fact that they made Reach showed that Bungie did have a desire to make more Halo games they just wanted to make other games, but apparently Microsoft didn't like that idea.[/quote]It was part of their separation contract. Bungie was under contract to create two more Halo games. They made ODST and Reach. ODST was a shorter project but they could get away with it, and Reach was not the start of a new series but a one off, so they were safe with it. They had to create those two games before they could dedicate the majority of their team to Destiny. [quote] That's right Bungie was allowed to help Sony in their development of the PS4 controller. Not to mention that Bungie and Sony has agreed to a partnership and you wonder why Bungie is showing off the PS4.[/quote]Two things to note. The first being that this was said because of the partnership. It is a very common practice to have developer input on the design of new technology. Microsoft does the same. So do countless others. The second being that Activision has the deal with Sony, not Bungie. Bungie is in a contract with Activision. None of that being relevant to anything I've said in the thread though, of course. [quote] You do understand that you we only guaranteed the beta with your preorder. Your beta length wasn't guaranteed. [/quote]? I didn't once mention anything about the length of the Beta. [quote] It's just like how Microsoft paid Activision for the Call of Duty DLCs. Now I know that this isn't Call of Duty but the premise remains the same.[/quote]The premise is entirely different. There is a reason people aren't complaining about COD DLC. There is a reason peopel aren't complaining about Bloodbourne being a PS4 exclusive even after Dark Souls I and II came out for the Xbox. The difference is in the history of the developer itself. That has been the entire point of the post- that they have a history of being community oriented and they have changed that. That would be the 'a theory' part of the title. Having missed the main point of the thread, I would appreciate it if you reread it looking to see the viewpoint I have presented, rather than to attack it based on words instead of the point itself. [quote] Dude lets be real here. You weren't loyal to Bungie when the first Halo came out, you were loyal to Halo which you said was owned by Microsoft. We all became loyal to Bungie in 2007 when they became their own independent company. That's the truth of the matter.[/quote] I became loyal to Bungie around 2005, so not when Halo came out even though I had played Halo since 2001. 2001-2005 I was but a Halo fan. After that point I became involved in the Bungie community. That is when the change occurred, and that is, again, the entire point of the thread. That Bungie cultivated a community and then turned from that into a business oriented entity. A final note... throughout this entire post, you never once actually commented on my actual argument. And that's saddening.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]Bungie did not 'sell' the rights to Halo to 343 in the terms people are stating it as. Microsoft purchased Bungie because Bungie did not have the financial resources to create the Halo project, so Bungie allowed themselves to be purchased in order to exist at all. When they were purchased, they owned everything Bungie. That means Microsoft owned Halo since 2000- a year before Halo: CE even came out. Ten years before 343 existed. Bungie did not 'sell' Halo to 343. Bungie simply got their independence from Microsoft and Halo remained owned by the same people that always owned it. [/quote] Can't find anything that confirms or denies this so lets move on. [quote]I never said that. Bungie didn't sell Halo at any point. However, they did obtain their right to be employee owned in 2007 because they wanted to work on other projects.[/quote] Whatever you say [quote] I supported Bungie because they made a game and, more importantly, a community that I could play and be highly involved in. It was not a support of Microsoft- it was a support of Bungie. Microsoft was often seen as the evil overseer. I certainly had no love for them, nor do I have much attachment to them now. It's the product I enjoy, not the company. And that makes all the difference considering it's both the product and the company I, and many, love with Bungie.[/quote] But as I said before Microsoft owned Bungie at that time so you supported Microsoft. [quote] It's not relevant to the argument but I wanted to clarify just as a fun fact- Destiny began conceptual development in 2008. The 2002 thing is not referring to Destiny, it's referring to concepts they wanted to use in their games that they didn't. It's not as if they were reserving it for Destiny.[/quote] From the Devs mouth, he said 2007. And I never said that they were referring to Destiny. [quote] It was part of their separation contract. Bungie was under contract to create two more Halo games. They made ODST and Reach. ODST was a shorter project but they could get away with it, and Reach was not the start of a new series but a one off, so they were safe with it. They had to create those two games before they could dedicate the majority of their team to Destiny.[/quote] I give you that. Still doesn't prove that Bungie didn't want to keep making Halo games [quote] Two things to note. The first being that this was said because of the partnership. It is a very common practice to have developer input on the design of new technology. Microsoft does the same. So do countless others. The second being that Activision has the deal with Sony, not Bungie. Bungie is in a contract with Activision. None of that being relevant to anything I've said in the thread though, of course.[/quote] It's relevant because Bungie has been working together with Sony before Activision was even in the picture and tell me what independent company helped design something for the Xbox One. [quote] I didn't once mention anything about the length of the Beta. [/quote] No but you brought it up so there you go. [quote] The premise is entirely different. There is a reason people aren't complaining about COD DLC. There is a reason peopel aren't complaining about Bloodbourne being a PS4 exclusive even after Dark Souls I and II came out for the Xbox. The difference is in the history of the developer itself. That has been the entire point of the post- that they have a history of being community oriented and they have changed that. That would be the 'a theory' part of the title. Having missed the main point of the thread, I would appreciate it if you reread it looking to see the viewpoint I have presented, rather than to attack it based on words instead of the point itself.[/quote] Ok I need you to inform yourself. People do in fact complain about the Cod exclusives. Just because you don't care about the game doesn't mean everyone shares your opinion. [quote]I became loyal to Bungie around 2005, so not when Halo came out even though I had played Halo since 2001. 2001-2005 I was but a Halo fan. After that point I became involved in the Bungie community. That is when the change occurred, and that is, again, the entire point of the thread. That Bungie cultivated a community and then turned from that into a business oriented entity. [/quote] Again you were loyal to Microsoft in 2005 because Bungie wasn't it's own entity. It was owned by Microsoft. Again you don't have an "actual argument" because there is nothing to be arguing about.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by burritosenior: 7/9/2014 7:13:19 PM
    [quote] But as I said before Microsoft owned Bungie at that time so you supported Microsoft.[/quote]I- the person with the opinion- am telling you that I supported Bungie, not Microsoft. I like the police department. They keep me safe. But the police department answers to the city, the city to the state, and the state to the federal government. Does that mean I support the federal government? I'll give you a hint- it doesn't. [quote] From the Devs mouth, he said 2007. [/quote] No, the developer said 'for more than a year' in 2009, and we know from a 2008 weekly update that they started in 2008. Sorry to say, but these are the things you learn when you've been involved as long as I have. [quote] I give you that. Still doesn't prove that Bungie didn't want to keep making Halo games[/quote]It's common knowledge. Here's one source for you.[quote][url=http://halo.bungie.net/news/content.aspx?type=news&cid=12835]But Bungie is like a shark. We have to keep moving to survive. We have to continually test ourselves, or we might as well be dolphins. Or manatees,” said Jason Jones, Bungie founder and partner.[/url].[/quote] [quote] It's relevant because Bungie has been working together with Sony before Activision was even in the picture and tell me what independent company helped design something for the Xbox One. [/quote]It's not relevant because it doesn't [i]matter[/i] if Bungie has been working with Sony. That has literally nothing whatsoever to do with my argument in any capacity imaginable. My entire post was about the treatment of Bungie's existing community, not with corporate deals made as they turned away fro that community. [quote] No but you brought it up so there you go.[/quote]No... I never once mentioned the length of the Beta in this thread until this post. [quote] Ok I need you to inform yourself. People do in fact complain about the Cod exclusives. Just because you don't care about the game doesn't mean everyone shares your opinion. [/quote]You aren't arguing the actual point, just the one part you don't like... if you want to have this discussion, you have to address the actual argument. You can't keep focusing on things like semantics.[quote] [quote] Again you were loyal to Microsoft in 2005 because Bungie wasn't it's own entity. It was owned by Microsoft.[/quote]I was never loyal to Microsoft. I was loyal to Bungie. Again, you haven't addressed my actual argument a single time in this thread. You keep arguing over things completely irrelevant to the post... [quote] Again you don't have an "actual argument" because there is nothing to be arguing about.[/quote]Apparently there is or you wouldn't be replying.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]I- the person with the opinion- am telling you that I supported Bungie, not Microsoft. I like the police department. They keep me safe. But the police department answers to the city, the city to the state, and the state to the federal government. Does that mean I support the federal government? I'll give you a hint- it doesn't.[/quote] With Microsoft owning Bungie you can't support one without supporting the other. It's just that simple. So you supported Microsoft. You can say that you supported Bungie all you want but you supported Microsoft. [quote] It's common knowledge. Here's one source for you.[/quote] Again they didn't say that they didn't want to make another Halo [quote] It's not relevant because it doesn't matter if Bungie has been working with Sony. That has literally nothing whatsoever to do with my argument in any capacity imaginable. My entire post was about the treatment of Bungie's existing community, not with corporate deals made as they turned away fro that community.[/quote] It actually does. It helps explain why Bungie has been favoring the PS4. [quote]No... I never once mentioned the length of the Beta in this thread until this post.[/quote] But you did bring up the beta [quote]You aren't arguing the actual point, just the one part you don't like... if you want to have this discussion, you have to address the actual argument. You can't keep focusing on things like semantics.[quote] Because you have no point. Bungie isn't neglecting the Xbox. That's your point and it's not much of one. [quote]I was never loyal to Microsoft. I was loyal to Bungie. Again, you haven't addressed my actual argument a single time in this thread. You keep arguing over things completely irrelevant to the post...[/quote] Again because you have no argument and your post is completely irrelevant.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Just in case you're not trying to troll, you might want to take a second to re-look through what you've written here. It's probably not coming across the way you intended it to...

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon