JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Service Warning
We are continuing to investigate issues of players encountering BEAVER error codes when attempting to play Destiny. Stand by for updates.

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.

Edited by Dustin: 6/23/2014 4:14:08 AM
10
1
Dustin

The most common misconception about science

Science isn't a collection of knowledge. No, science is a way of thinking. It's about validating an idea through testing without bias or error, but with the severe constraints of resources and human capability. It is a means of creating knowledge the most reliable way possible. The scientific method is never debated. There may be disagreement over whether it was followed properly, but scientists don't question whether or not it's necessary to, for example, isolate an independent variable before running an experiment. No one ever asks, 'is two plus two really four?' They don't because the process is mechanical and it only states what is true for what can be proven. As long as the scientific method is followed correctly, and people are content that it is, all that is left to discourse over is the speculation for what has yet to be proven. And people often confuse that with debate over the scientific method. When scientists were trying to figure out the shape of the universe, in which none of the possibilities of potential shapes had a majority of the support, were the scientists speculating, not arguing the scientific method. Information we've collected using the scientific method [i]isn't[/i] an opinion. It is fact. It may never be completely proven granted the infinite amount of possibilities that could also be true, but it puts us within arm's reach of reasoning and coming up with conclusions like, 'the Earth orbits the Sun.' There will always be the possibility that maybe an ancient civilization once visited earth a long time ago and piled up fossils in the ground in a way that made it seem like species were living a long time ago when maybe there really wasn't any species living millions of years ago, but the science grants us the power to reason that it's more likely that there weren't any aliens trying to mess with us and the fossils we're looking at are genuine, natural, and represent actual species from ages before ours. You don't have to make any conclusion based on the evidence and still not be wrong. But what you can't do is outright deny the evidence itself. And there are far too many people that think they can.
Add more answer options

Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post.

  • Yes! A man of science =) Im glad someone knows the difference between theory and THEORY
    Add more answer options

    Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post.

  • Edited by Methew: 6/23/2014 4:14:52 AM
    "It's only the Theory of Evolution. That means they haven't proven it yet. Ergo it's false and ID/Creationism [strike]is[/strike] could be correct." Swear to -blam!-ing God/Yahweh/Allah/Buddha/Odin/Zeus/Shiva/FSM I will bitch slap the next -blam!- that says this and actually means it.
    Add more answer options

    Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post.

  • Thanks for the unnecessary thread.
    Add more answer options

    Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post.

    1 Reply
    • congratulations
      Add more answer options

      Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post.

      3 Replies
      • I got lost...is this something about how religion is better than science?
        Add more answer options

        Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post.

        2 Replies
        • tldr
          Add more answer options

          Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post.

          2 Replies
          • science rulz
            Add more answer options

            Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post.

          • Edited by Warlock: 6/23/2014 3:58:10 AM
            Are you sure this is a misnconseption? I was fairly certain our teachers made it clear that there's a difference between knowledge and obtaining knowledge through science. Also, [quote]Information we've collected using the scientific method isn't an opinion. It is fact.[/quote] You might want to tread lightly here. Although this statement is generally true, there have been times when false conclusions have been reached through the scientific method, be it human error, instrument error, etc. Basically it just comes down to data precision. Then again in the grand scheme of things, peer review could help invalidate some false findings if you want to include that.
            Add more answer options

            Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post.

            2 Replies
            • Tide comes in, tide goes out. Sun goes up, sun goes down. Your science can't explain that. The Bible is the only way.
              Add more answer options

              Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post.

            preload icon
            preload icon
            preload icon
            You are not allowed to view this content.