First off, I know everyone says that CoD never changes. Admittedly, it doesn't change much, but it has changed over the years.
Does anyone miss the good maps? Maps that weren't just rubble falling everywhere for cover. Maps that actually had flanking roots, not just rooms with three doors in different corners of the room.
Does anyone miss the simple unlock system, weapons, and perks? The system where there were three available attachments and you could only choose one. When you could only have three perks and they did exactly what they said, no pro versions or stupid catches for the perk to "work properly."
Does anyone miss the killstreak system? Three killstreaks, unlocked at three, five, and seven kills, and everyone had the same killstreaks.
I ask these questions because the last four CoD games have just added in unnecessary gimmicks that make the game more frustrating, and ultimately boring. There's always one weapon with a certain attachment, or attachments, that trumps everything else. It's no longer about choosing the weapon you like, but more about choose the most overpowered class because KD means everything.
So, Flood. Do you want CoD, or any other game, to go back to how it was? Discuss changes that have been made to game franchises over the last few years and your opinion on those changes.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Marcellos007 I agree with you Op. The ultimate classic Call of Duty is my dream.[/quote] This is a kind of dumb idea, but I'd like to see a Call of Duty anniversary game on next-gen consoles. A game that has the campaigns from CoD2, CoD4, and WaW, and also a multiplayer with modes for each respective game with all the maps and weapons, combined with a moshpit mode that has every map from each game and you can use the weapons and perks from each game. You could be using a Thompson or M1 Garand on Bloc.