[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] ClearOrangeZero [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Forever MS [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Mythical Wolf Trust you to take that out of context. I meant the in game counter.[/quote] Lol, do you know what "out of context" even means? Because he didn't take your post "out of context".[/quote]Perhaps you just missed the first two posts in this thread, the OP and Mythical Wolf's first post. After reading those, you should see how out of context GodLike took that post, the extent of which is otherwise indiscernible.[/quote] Oh no, its the "[url=http://www.bungie.net/Forums/posts.aspx?postID=76279528]kind of in essay writing mode atm[/url] ([i]and failing[/i]) boy again. Will spell it out slowly for you; - Original subject "[i]Do fans like Reach over Halo 4[/i]" - Wolfies claim "[i]The population counter is frozen but Halo 4 is worse than Reach[/i]" - I point to [url=http://majornelson.com/2012/12/13/live-activity-for-week-of-dec-3/]a working population counter[/url] which clearly shows more people play Halo 4. Now given that the OP questioned that he had "[i]a feeling people think Halo 4 died quickly[/i]" because "[i]the stats were shocking[/i]" ... wolf statement that the "[i]counter is frozen[/i]" may be true - but to then draw the conclusion that "Halo 4 is worse than Reach" is false, especially given that wolf already knows how to compare population counts via the Major Nelson site. Now back to your trolling attempt ... explain wich part you find '[i]indiscernible[/i]'?