{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/27/2015 8:41:53 PM
5
Genetic Engineering and Radical Science
Thoughts? Keep the discussions civil and what not.
What I mean by lightly regulate is there few laws regarding this technology and it would be easily attainable for anyone.
What I mean by heavily regulate is that only people who would need the technology, like a medical problem, would be able to get it.
The other 2 are self explanatory.
What I mean by radical sciences is everything from controversial medicine, like genetic engineering, to things like AI (artificial intelligence).
-
3 RepliesDoes this include human augmentation? Like Deus Ex kinda stuff?
-
Have people like Stephen Hawking judge the research as to whether it needs regulation or not.
-
Regulation [i]by scientists[/i]. That way, you prevent the mad scientist horror experiments and allow research to progress without political bullshit getting in the way.
-
Keep going until we get real catgirls.
-
Safety assessments, labels, and fail-safes built-in.
