I'll be honest, I'm a little sick of everyone bitching about arcblade when they've never touched the damn thing in their life. So I looked at my own stats to see how much I use arcblade and if it really is as OP as everyone claims. Here are the Crucible results for my [url=http://www.bungie.net/en/Legend/1/4611686018429984193/2305843009216785518#context=crucible&section=none]bladedancer hunter[/url] and here are the results for my [url=http://www.bungie.net/en/Legend/1/4611686018429984193/2305843009220369528#context=crucible&section=none]Voidwalker Warlock[/url] Now I did the math and these are the results: For my hunter, 15.7% of my kills are with my super, this is less than a quarter of my total crucible kills which means that for every 10 kills I get in the crucible, 1.6 of them are an arcblade kill. That's hardly overpowered when 36.4% of my total kills are with primary weapons. Now we move to my warlock, where Nova Bombs make up 17.2% of my total kill count. While granted this isn't much different it is higher, so percentage wise I get more super kills per game with my warlock than I do with my hunter, so that chucks the "Arcblade is more OP than other supers" idea out the window. On top of all this my hunter is my main and I have had much more experience with him, so I'm probably better with arcblade than I am with Nova Bomb, yet I still get less kills per game with it. This shows that, for me at least, Nova Bomb is a more powerful super than Arcblade. What's that I hear? I'm better with Nova Bomb than Arcblade? Well then that proves that Arcblade is balanced, cause if it was overpowered then I would definitely be getting more kills with it than I would with Nova Bomb because it would be a superior ability. Please let this put an end to the Arcblade nerfing threads once and for all, bump if you agree with me.