It goes beyond just PoE and ToO. It's about fixing the mess that was TDB. They finally are starting to make changes that make sense (uses for npcs, weapon reforging, new weapon class, new weapon talents, minimizing all these stupid currencies, crafting bosses that are more than just bullet sponges that actually have somewhat creative mechanics, showing pvp players some love, etc... For that reason I gave it a B. Just the content itself was a C/D, but the general way that the game is headed is very promising and they went a long ways towards making Destiny a better game in the future.

Trials is good....POE is lame.

Campaign: B overall good Good contained story that makes sense. But no cutscenes. Gear: C mixed bag New good legendary weapons, but mixed bag losing perks like field scout, and full auto on pulse rifles. Some of the best scout rifles the game has ever had are from HoW. The PoE weapons all have "dead" fallen only perks making them the worst in the game. PoE armor is generally considered some of the ugliest armor ever put into the game i.e. Titan PoE helm. ToO armor and weapons on the other hand are considered some of the best. Endgame: C mixed bag, should/could be better PoE: the static challenge arenas of levels 32, 34, 35 make PoE boring in the long run. The idea behind PoE was the modifiers could and would change. But the rounds except for skolas' modifiers are always exactly the same. A system that was made so it would not become repetitive has become repetitive because it does not change. The modifiers are not random. It is not procedurally generated. ToO: great idea but magnified every issue pvp had and became the game of thorns. Matching for connection was good but the issue of weapon balance was made all the more poignant. As a endgame activity it was really unforgiving to casual players. The rewards and reward structure though for ToO is one of the best in the game if you can manage the 7 wins. HoW overall grade C moments of great design obviously not taken far enough. But disappointing rewards from PoE and the newly missing perks hold it back.

Peter Dinklage said NO

I wish they would rotate the 35 boss like the others as well

In the Netherlands we rate things from 1-10 1 is the lowest and 10 the highest! In Germany they rate it from 1-6, 1 the best and 6 the worst! In France they rate it from 0-20 0 the worst and 20 the highest

4, just 4. I'm not going to give a scale to reference, just 4.

In England the grades go A*,A,B,C,D,E and U replaces F (ungraded)

House of wolves got me into PvP, and trials is fun, and a great challenge

Who tf picked A?

I said C for the poll. But you mentioned the grading system of schools: In the schools I've been in (private schools); One had E (Excellent) as the highest grade, then A-D and F as failing, but in that school anything C or below would merit disciplinary action. In my current school, if you get below an 80, you are failing and if you fail three classes (throughout all four years) you are kicked out of the school.

Solid D- for Destiny in its entirity. Barely any content, laggy PVP, grind fest, repetitive and unimaginative content, lazy item design. The only reason I give it better than an F is because it is playable and to put that into perspective, Shenmue is playable but not fun or good.

For ideas. It needs a solid B. They introduced PoE which they crafted into a pretty good replacement for a raid. ToO was a good edition and you can't call ToO bad because all of Crucible is broken. As an idea without basis, it's great. All the little tid bits were nice too. New modifiers. Recrafting. Ascending. Etc. What could they have done better? Story, as is the problem with Destiny. ToO can get really frustrating. Even moreso than normal Crucible. A lot of potential they didn't touch