-
Thanks for your time and effort
-
PVP nerfs always, always screw it up for PVE. So, no.
-
Did you read the part where I said 'msybe' pvp I ly? I guess not. Thanks for your time and effort
-
“Maybe in PvP” ..ergo also screws it up for PVE. So, NO NO & NO.
-
Not what I said. I was offering up options for responders. I made no statement to that myself.
-
Yes you did. Stop gaslighting.
-
Lol stop strawmanning and using terms you don't understand. Have a good night.
-
Nice try gas lighting again then trying to shut down your lameness. It’s right there in black and white: Your the one that says it should only form puddles on direct hits and it’s way too easy [i]for PVP[/i]. So again. No. Come back and try your elementary rhetorical prestidigitation on someone else bub. Dumb idea. Come back when you have grown a few more synapses.
-
Bearbeitet von X-LoganX: 1/10/2023 1:29:33 PM[quote]Your the one that says it should only form puddles on direct hits and it’s way too easy [i]for PVP[/i].[/quote] No. I said the puddle should only [u]activate[/u] (form) on a direct hit. And added that [u]maybe[/u] only in pvp (as an optional change). I guess reading isn't a strong suit. That's ok. I can't expect everyone to get it on the first try. Also, thanks for your raging toxicity as is common here. Most of the people replying, even if we disagreed, have been mostly cordial. Thanks for reminding what this place can be like 👍🏼
-
Again, using “maybe” does not get you off the hook. Again, bad idea. You’re simply trying to make it harder for new players and others because it’s “too easy”. Again, more gas lighting. You seem to think everything you write is an epoch tome that “maybe” should be considered. It’s just more nonsense about nerfing and putting others down with sideways insults. Then you resort to insults when I disagreed. Apparently “no” is not understood by you and you needed more input. When you received it you did not like it and tried to shut me down with your comments. Come back when you understand: 1. Gas lighting 2. Disingenuous arguments 3. Toxic behavior on your part
-
Bearbeitet von X-LoganX: 1/10/2023 6:51:50 PMLol. Now who's Gaslighting. Pot meet kettle. Take tour strawman somewhere else. I've been dealing with forum tools for almost 3 decades. Nothing you say hurts or has any relevance 🤣 Oh...but you insulting me initially is ok. Add hypocrite to your resume.
-
More gas lighting. You threw down the metaphorical glove bub. I simply responded. You insulted me first (or tried as it was an epic failure). Interesting behavior on your part actually. You keep trying to bolster yourself with “3 decades” and oh yes the emojis. All of this points to a clear lack of self awareness on your part which is typical of has lighters.
-
Bearbeitet von X-LoganX: 1/10/2023 7:06:29 PMOk my guy. Have fun with your diagnosis. It's been a gas for me. Pure entertainment on the amount of effort used to present me this. I hope this is something you try to make a living from.
-
Again, nice try. You fail to comprehend that your opening salvo included “should require some skill..” One can extrapolate from that: 1. You believe less skilled players should not have it [b][i]so easy.[/i][/b] 2. You believe your lame suggestion is worthy of more than a [b]no[/b] 3. You have been killed repeatedly by [b][i]less skilled [/i][/b] players with Witherhoard and thinks it’s beneath you. All the above marks you as a dilettante at best or an upset little boy that weeps when others best him in the crucible, especially those [b][i]lesser players[/i][/b]. So again [b][i]No[/i][/b] And again I graciously accept your defeat. Move on.
-
There's no real defeat here sir. It's ok if you or anyone don't agree with me, however the difference between you and others is you started with your diagnosis in the attempt to put yourself in a position of power over me by belittling my thought process. And no your initial answer of 'no' was not an appropriate answer. So I will remain happy with how I presented my thought and continue to have constructive debates and conversations with other. Not with a laughable armchair psychologist. Have a good day. I'm not going to jute you because that is childish, I'm simply done responding in confidence that you've made zero headway in your attempts to belittle someone online.
-
[quote]The blight puddle should only form on a direct hit. Sure maybe only in pvp. It [i]waaayy[/i] to easy to use oppressively in pvp. It should at least require [u]some[/u] skill to proc it's most powerful feature. Thoughts?[/quote] That’s you fantastic argument? [i][b]It waaayy to easy to use..[/b][/i] [i]require skill to proc..[/i] If those stand as a good arguments and more deserving of a one word answer, then you need to change where your buying your weed.
-
Oh more insults? I will accept your “flag of defeat” graciously. Perhaps you have learned something.
-
Not insults, observational conclusions. Big difference. Insults rarely have facts behind them. You've provided enough for me to make a conclusion though. Meanwhile your insults to me are vague and circumstantial. But I wasn't expecting much more. Hopefully you're as board with this as I've become. No matter the entertainment value. Have fun hyper-analyzing gamers.