JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#feedback

Bearbeitet von ZeroZX1990: 6/25/2017 8:47:44 AM
53

Do you think bungie ruined D1 so you have to buy D2?

Yes probably

292

No they would never

95

Do you think they left D1 in this state on purpose? I can't immagine this patch going through playtesting and everyone saying: "Yup that looks good. If we basically take away the special ammo there will be a lot of primary gunfights. Also let's bring back icebreaker and give sidearm special,too." Like seriously how can you think removing onehitkilling-things will not lead to OTHER OHK-things becoming more dominant? If you raise the TTK on every primary, of course people can walk up to someone and stick them and get away before the other guy has a chance to kill him... And the most important question: Why do you not release another fvcking weaponsbalance, ffs? You dont have to recode a thing, just fvcking tweak some numbers or simply reverse the changes. There is no point in taking away special ammo if you introduce/have a freakin weapon that defies the rules of the game! Seriously after all those idiotic nerfs you might think bungie learned something, but they still continue their line of "patches". And now that they basically made any serious crucible activity unplayable if you don't have an icebreaker, because you are at an major disadvantage because you have to pick up those green boxes, they stop updating D1? I am seriously starting to think, they do this deliberately, because the nice way to say goodbye would have been to revert the ammo changes and use their brain one last time to try and make the game at least fun again indtead of looking at their stupid numbers. If it is gonna be the same sandbox team for D2, I really don' t have hope... If you made it this far, thank you for reading and keep it clean in the comments!

Sprache des Beitrags:

 

Bearbeiten
Vorschau

Benimm dich. Nimm dir eine Minute, um dir unsere Verhaltensregeln durchzulesen, bevor du den Beitrag abschickst. Abbrechen Bearbeiten Einsatztrupp erstellen Posten

Gesamtes Thema ansehen
  • Bearbeitet von TheShadow-cali: 6/26/2017 3:14:37 PM
    With the changes made in D2 knowing most are comfortable with the loadouts of D1, the characters abilities etc. Their actions say enough to know there was a lot stupid decisions in this game the last couple years. If they actually put the effort in doing whats right It would be hard for gamers to really want to play the D2. Look at how much they actually REMOVED from the game at this point. More then any company that I know of that makes a sequel. PvP was literally cut in half. Characters abilities were removed. In fact a couple well liked. No private matches No SRL Clans use to have 2 events that 6 as a group could run and now it's 1 Loadouts were change and IMO for the worse. No ranking system. Edit: Less weapon customizing. Destiny 2 Has Faction Vendors But They Won’t Sell Weapons https://gamerant.com/destiny-2-faction-vendors-weapons/ Luke smith throwing important characters in the trash. Guess everything is Expendable in this game when it comes to him. Vault space? Three years later and it sounds like they're still having problems. 2017 and what's the excuse now? This company made billions this last couple years and where are they mostly focusing their attention on? [spoiler]PC[/spoiler] No 60fps but we can live without it. Of course there's been debates about it on this forum. Dedicated servers? No trials which will be added later as part of a new DLC. That part im glad because how much trials effect this entire game for the worse. Who knows whatever else this company REMOVED that D1 has? Yes, some of what I stated will be added later, but used as part of a new DLC. It's called reinsurance that you will buy and still play the game. Not that they haven't had years to come up with a better sequel knowing they're a AAA gaming company. It's just most of this companies fanbase loves to give a free pass and try to justify their deliberate poor actions. But, it doesn't mean the whole game is messed up nor does it mean that there wasn't some importants. It's just means to me that having less content leaves less room for an actual incentive and this companies actions this last 3 years is not a good sign.

    Sprache des Beitrags:

     

    Bearbeiten
    Vorschau

    Benimm dich. Nimm dir eine Minute, um dir unsere Verhaltensregeln durchzulesen, bevor du den Beitrag abschickst. Abbrechen Bearbeiten Einsatztrupp erstellen Posten

    24 Antworten
    Es ist dir nicht gestattet, diesen Inhalt zu sehen.
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon