Yeah, you fail again.
https://www.nasa.gov/larc/scientists-recreate-earth-s-northern-lights
English
-
Bearbeitet von Apollos: 1/11/2017 1:51:29 AMThis only proves it is possible on a sphere, however, they did not test this on a disc, so it is not disproven. In short, this means very little. Edit: sorry, i am mistaken. Dont mind this
-
Bearbeitet von The Cellar Door: 1/9/2017 11:02:20 PM[quote] they did not test this on a disc[/quote] >not understand the basics of electromagnetism >never heard of Maxwell Yea you definitely shouldn't be talking about physics.
-
Bearbeitet von Apollos: 1/10/2017 10:52:36 PMOk? Then show me. I am not knowledgable in the subject, so forgive my ignorance. I can only assume you mean it is impossible on a disc ir other flat-like surface.
-
Bearbeitet von The Cellar Door: 1/11/2017 4:46:34 AMWell no, it's one of the basic tenets of electromagnetism that an electric current traveling in a circle will generate a magnetic field. Conversely, a circular magnetic field will have a perpendicular electric current. It's why we call it the "electromagnetic" force rather than the "electrostatic" and "magnetic" forces. Because they are interrelated in this manner, particles which carry an electric charge, such as protons and electrons, must abide by the direction of the current from the magnetic field. So, it doesn't actually matter what the shape is really, because if those charged particles have a place to travel towards within the atmosphere, they will end up exciting the particles in the atmosphere, giving off light. Above, you can see a picture of [url=http://www.unc.edu/depts/oceanweb/turtles/geomag.gif]Earth[/url] (spherical) with its magnetic field lines. Charged particles are redirected towards North by the magnetic field. Far enough North and the magnetic field lines become more bunched up, meaning these particles get redirected closer and closer to the surface. On a disk, it would depend on how the magnetic field looked. You have one of two options, the more unstable and probably impossible would be one side of the disk being North and the other being South. Or, you can have a radial magnetic field, where outwards is North and inwards is South. Either way, the charged particles will still interact with the magnetic field in the same exact manner. Questioning if it would be possible on a disk is an under-informed inquiry, because the laws we've made to understand the nature of this interaction are not only universal, but the mathematics describe it through the use of circles.
-
I love it when you talk science.
-
Actually, it means quite a lot in terms of a response to OPs claim. He asked what proof science has? Well they recreated it in a lab, pretty solid proof.
-
It does go to show it is possible on a sphere, but [b][i][u]IF[/u][/i][/b] (big IF there) the earth is flat, then we need to show it is impossible in a flat earth. I feel like i am missing something
-
The whole necessity of it being a sphere for the experiment to work... That's what youre missing.
-
Aw shit. Thanks, i dont know hardly anything about it that subject. Sorry bout that
-
The whole necessity of it being a sphere for the experiment to work... That's what youre missing.
-
Bumppppppppppp
-
[quote]Their simulation, generated by a device called Planeterrella, combines all of the necessary ingredients – a magnetic field, charged particles, and a [b]sphere[/b][/quote]
-
A SPHERE? Meanwhile, in Krishna's mind~ *X-files theme*
-
And I get no response.
-
[quote][quote]Their simulation, generated by a device called Planeterrella, combines all of the necessary ingredients – a magnetic field, charged particles, and a [b]sphere[/b][/quote][/quote]
-
He'll just say nasa is fake or run by the government to control all chicken for their dinner tonight so this isn't a "reliable" source for him