Another argument about distance
[quote]First I'm wondering if you understand circumnavigation in terms of a flat earth. So if we were on a flat then earth traveling east will take you around the north pole in a circle. That is true for round earth theory and flat earth theory.
The "supposed" equator on the round earth theory is where it would take the longest to circumnavigate the earth. Or where it would take the longest to run around the north pole in a circle.
Where the longest distance it would take to circumnavigate the earth in a flat earth theory is Antarctica. Because on a flat earth Antarctica is the very edge of the circle.
Why is it then that it takes longer to circle around, or circumnavigate around the where flat earth theory defines the equator than it takes to circumnavigate further south?
For example, wouldn't flat earth theory define that it takes much longer to travel from the southern end of South America to the southern end of Africa while continously keeping East direction than it would take if you went from the equator in South America to Africa also in an eastern fashion?
What does flat earthers say to explain the phenomenon of it taking less time to cover what a flat earther perceive as a greater distance?[/quote]
English
-
This has been sent to you more than once and you don't respond because you can't refute this.
-
[quote]This has been sent to you more than once and you don't respond because you can't refute this.[/quote]
-
[quote]This has been sent to you more than once and you don't respond because you can't refute this.[/quote]