I personally don't feel like it is, no objectives may promote camping. I won't be surprised to see people camping their own spawn with snipers and only occasionally venturing forward for special ammo.
What are your opinions? Would it have been better off still being control? Or another game mode?
[b][i]EDIT[/i][/b] Some very good points being made in favour of clash, obviously the blueberries having no clue of holding objectives in control was a major drag for everyone who knew to hold flags. Kills only should (you'd expect) be easy enough for those random teammates.
[b][i]EDIT 2[/i][/b] A lot of guardians happy for the change, which I totally agree on, many happy that they won't have to rely on blueberries to play objectives too, again I agree.
As we all know, the standard of players in the banner compared to regular crucible (barring daily modes) drops slightly, do you feel it is easier to carry a team to victory despite only a few going positive K/DRs?
[b][i]EDIT 3[/i][/b] Nice to see so many of you with constructive comments and reasoning to your choices, only a few toxic comments, who, with their stats, will not be enjoying the banner regardless of game type.
I'm definitely looking forward to challenging some of you guardians during the event and maybe even seeing you owning as the blueberries on my team too.
Most of all, I hope the banner blesses you all with good RNG (yes even the toxic commenters), we all know how bad it can be.
[b][i]EDIT IN PLAY[/i][/b]
Well as we all know banner has arrived. And whilst I'm enjoying the change. Playing alone provides new challenges other than the mode itself. I've had to almost literally carry teams to a win on a few occasions and it's definitely not as fun (for me) as it used to be. If any of you are finding difficulty getting a group together for PS4 send me a pm and we could run together. My stats are available (PS not much history as was a new account)
-
I don't really care, but I still prefer Control. I usually avoid team deathmatch style game modes in most games because it encourages camping more than objective based game modes.
-
-blam!- iron banner.
-
No, it should have been Zone control
-
Yes - No one goes for the control zones anyway
-
Let's talk camping. Like that team that camps and just snipes B? Clash will have campers sure, but at least in clash you can hunt those bitches down, instead of having to worry about cap points. It will also make for faster IB matches. I don't know about you, bit I have always felt clash matches finish the fastest. Faster completions means more matches, which means more chances at rewards, and faster rep gains when you are winning. It's also, I feel going to give them a better idea about hammer of sol. Last IB it was a powerhouse because you would walk up on a cap point and get 3-4 kills, maybe more, because people were capping. With clash, your enemies will be more spread out. Lastly, when you think about IB is all about lore wise, clash makes more sense. H opefully this is a trend that continues. Let's see IB rift, IB skirmish, etc. I think everything but elimination should find its way into IB, just to keep it fresh.
-
1 AntwortenToo early to say, but it cannot hurt to try. Campers are going to camp regardless. I welcome the change, if anything it will make for a fun change of pace.
-
1 AntwortenBearbeitet von Hawklune: 11/13/2015 12:55:30 PMYes because people play control like its clash anyway. No objective other than to kill the opposing team will be refreshing. Also mayhem clash for iron banner should be a thing.
-
People have been camping since the beginning with it being control, so clash isn't changing much in that regard.
-
it might be interesting, im down...especially since they fixed the rewards... [spoiler]we shall see[/spoiler]
-
1 AntwortenPeople just gona be Camping in -blam!- back of -blam!- map together
-
It's good to change it up IMO
-
Don't care
-
2 AntwortenYes. I am so sick of control. People sit back and farm kills without playing the objective then think they are on a team that sucks when they don't win because they never capped any zones.
-
Yes. It's something different.
-
Bearbeitet von OldDirtyCamper: 11/13/2015 12:46:46 PMIt will be Shotgun City just like always.
-
dont care cause the last iron banner they changed the perk on the boots from something usefull in trials to somenting pointless. I'm just done witht he whole game at this point.
-
Most people in Iron Banner play like it's clash anyway
-
I say yes, if you're playing alone and join a team of randoms, they'll always be garbage at objective games At least with clash you'll have a slightly higher chance of winning..
-
1 AntwortenClash is only killing no objective :D
-
2 AntwortenClash is boring. [b]Mayhem Clash[/b] on the other hand, is so much fun. :-P
-
Last IB I had about 1.75 kd which is about .5 higher than normal. I'm better at clash than control so I'm wondering what my kd will be this time. I feel that more people that don't normally play crucible. I play both about the same amount so I feel confident going into crucible even though I don't have the best light.
-
No more flipping to A spawn anymore. Yay.
-
Who cares just give us something new
-
Terrible idea. Should always be team objective other than just kill. I'd even be in favor of a 6v6 Salvage over Clash. It will be what it will be though, so let it happen. Hoping for better drops and some more weapons. Need Nirwen on my ps4 characters too so I hope it drops along the way too.
-
7 AntwortenNot that it matters anyway. It's the same old unbalanced pvp & the same event with the same useless weapons which are at 280-290
-
I welcome the change, i think it will make things more interesting.