I personally don't feel like it is, no objectives may promote camping. I won't be surprised to see people camping their own spawn with snipers and only occasionally venturing forward for special ammo.
What are your opinions? Would it have been better off still being control? Or another game mode?
[b][i]EDIT[/i][/b] Some very good points being made in favour of clash, obviously the blueberries having no clue of holding objectives in control was a major drag for everyone who knew to hold flags. Kills only should (you'd expect) be easy enough for those random teammates.
[b][i]EDIT 2[/i][/b] A lot of guardians happy for the change, which I totally agree on, many happy that they won't have to rely on blueberries to play objectives too, again I agree.
As we all know, the standard of players in the banner compared to regular crucible (barring daily modes) drops slightly, do you feel it is easier to carry a team to victory despite only a few going positive K/DRs?
[b][i]EDIT 3[/i][/b] Nice to see so many of you with constructive comments and reasoning to your choices, only a few toxic comments, who, with their stats, will not be enjoying the banner regardless of game type.
I'm definitely looking forward to challenging some of you guardians during the event and maybe even seeing you owning as the blueberries on my team too.
Most of all, I hope the banner blesses you all with good RNG (yes even the toxic commenters), we all know how bad it can be.
[b][i]EDIT IN PLAY[/i][/b]
Well as we all know banner has arrived. And whilst I'm enjoying the change. Playing alone provides new challenges other than the mode itself. I've had to almost literally carry teams to a win on a few occasions and it's definitely not as fun (for me) as it used to be. If any of you are finding difficulty getting a group together for PS4 send me a pm and we could run together. My stats are available (PS not much history as was a new account)
-
Too lazy to explain but a great change.
-
2 AntwortenOf coarse the better teams will camp more. It's TDM. The more you die the more you will hurt your team. It's a different game type. You must adjust accordingly. Now if you can run around and kill much more than you die then more power to ya. But anything below a 1.5 and ur really not helping much.
-
Yes because no one ever played the damn objective part anyway
-
2 AntwortenNo. We may see a rise in sniper/campers, which would slow things down a lot. People are complaining about randoms playing control incorrectly, but only a few bounties require a win. I guess variety is never a bad thing though.... Can i change my vote to dont care?
-
1 AntwortenYes, hopefully people will stop crying about other people not capping zones, or capping the wrong zones and causing a spawn flip. Just kill, kill, kill.
-
6 AntwortenIt's a joke Run around Shot gun Super Zero goals
-
3 AntwortenYes and -blam!- you You can't make me explain why.
-
Clash is the superior game mode
-
1 AntwortenYes because you're not dependent on the entirety of your team, no because I can foresee some unfair tactics because of this. [spoiler]I could always be wrong about that tho[/spoiler]
-
1 AntwortenWhere's the "Yeah and i wont explain why because all other opinions are invalid," option?
-
Teammates never were helpful in Control.
-
I'm happy about it, personally I think it should be inferno clash but that's not likely. It would also be cool if they just rotated the game modes between clash and control.
-
4 AntwortenNo, high end pvp should boil down to more than something as generic as a clash match. Objectives like control add more to the experience and make the match as a whole a more strategic experience. Not everyone will agree with that, but when the "level advantages" are already practically non-existent (270 people killing 300+ people easily). There has to be more than just clash
-
2 AntwortenAren't we all tired of Iron Banner being the SAME DAMN GAME MODE SINCE DAY -blam!-ING 1?!
-
3 AntwortenI think it should be a mix of control and clash just like classic 6v6
-
1 AntwortenShould have made it mayhem, that's the only fun game mode in pvp.
-
6v6 salvage. Nuff said
-
2 AntwortenYes. 90% of the time when I play with randoms it feels like I'm playing clash already since no one captures the zones
-
finally I've been waiting for it be clash since first iron banner dropped. Now all the scrubs who say k/d doesn't matter will be crying by the middle of next week.
-
People just camp and get sweaty over kills, so why not just take away the flags and truly make it about killing so random teams aren't consisted of 3 people not giving a shit about flags and 3 people trying to win the game.
-
Too little,too late.Players asked for this ages ago....
-
I still don't capture objectives when it's control. I prefer to play population control and slay the enemy than sit on a flag and catch supers with my face
-
1 AntwortenIt's called the Iron BANNER for a reason, it should be control or zone control
-
Inferno clash would be good
-
Yes because The Iron Banner should be about skill. In control you could play against a team that gets less kills but has more zones. In clash its all about kills the team with less kills loses and there wont be camping on zones.
-
4 AntwortenThere are certainly advantages to the change, but with how much everyone has been hating snipers lately, I could definitely see this one being Iron Sniper.