AFK is not an issue during strikes since they can be easily soloed at this point.
English
-
That was a horrible argument. It's not a problem because they can be soloed? You do the work, they get rewarded. Sorry, that's a problem.
-
That's not the point. why should I have to do all the work for some guy just standing there to get rewards.
-
That would make sense if your rewards were lessened by virtue of his presence, but you get the same reward whether he's there or not. Afk players are a non issue unless you actually need a full fire team to complete this activity. Otherwise it affects you not at all.
-
I don't need a full fire team. Yes they can be soloed. But I guess you still don't understand the point....doesn't surprise me Since you're defending AFKers so much. I'm not going to do a strike and do all the work to let some lazy scrub gain rep, get marks, and have a chance at loot for doing nothing. You want to join strike playlist... Pull your own weight. Otherwise GTFO
-
I'm sure you'd feel this way if someone doing the exact same job as you, getting paid the same, does no work while you work your ass off. Then the boss does nothing about even though they know. This mentality is why people do this garbage, people love to let other people be freeloaders.
-
People do this all the time... Why would it bother me? Are people really still clinging to the childish notion that life is supposed to be fair? Santa Claus isn't real either.
-
Yeah, you're right. Let's give up on everyone having an equal chance. Oh we did, it's called welfare and we tell those people it's not their fault that they didn't try hard enough.
-
That would be relevant if that's what I had said or even implied.