Yes. People who abandon a series based on one flop are cancer.
English
-
Totally agree with you.
-
Edited by skittlez86: 1/10/2015 6:50:30 PMYour reasonable... just a tip stay off the BioWare Forums
-
What about people like me who abandon a series based on three flops
-
1-Great 2-Was OK 3-Good (If made with a better ending and resolution to your team mates GoTDecade)
-
2 was the best
-
Then you're also an idiot for buying the third game if you thought the first two were shit.
-
I bought the third first actually. Got the other two cheap to see what all the fuss was about and was greeted with games that were no better than the third
-
None of the games flopped.
-
Financially, sure. Critically, sure. But they were definitely flops from my personal view
-
Maybe they shouldn't make such a shitty ending.
-
well we will let you know how the new one ends ; )
-
So the ending suddenly made the entire franchise shit?
-
Edited by ANABOLIC INO: 9/6/2014 9:49:49 PMYes, completely, utterly, and totally. The ending was the biggest waste of $180 ever, I could've easily snapped the game in half thats how bad that steaming shit was. Its like reading a book and following every line just to have the last page set on fire.
-
So it completely invalidated all of the enjoyment you had throughout the series? You sound ridiculous.
-
Yeah pretty much. I don't enjoy an entire galaxy and story revolving around a character I created just to watch my character die at the end of the final game. What the hell is the point of creating a story around MY character if the story doesn't even end the way I want it to?
-
You still enjoyed the games when you played them (minus the ending). There's no denying it, and you're unable to change that.
-
I did. But the ending just ruined the entire story because everything I did was pointless. Half the people I saved still died, none of the characters from ME2 I wanted were on my team, and I died. Not to mention so did half the galaxy despite me saving everybody throughout the game except Jack because I didn't know the mission would disappear.
-
You make a better ending.
-
Theres an actual boss fight. Shephard lives without turning the whole universe into half-bred robots. Everyone is saved, there isn't a galactic genocide and the universe isn't completely cut off from eachother. The end.
-
Good one. Too Mainstream.
-
-
Not too mainstream, that was the entire f[u]u[/u]cking point. Why would I play through 3 games uniting a galaxy to stop a galactic genocide just to either 1: die and watch everyone abandon eachother. 2: turn into a robot-alien and let everybody relearn everything about every single organism EVER. Or 3: Still die and become a giant ass sea-scuttling robot. Like seriously. What the hell is the point of unifying a galaxy just to have it cut off everybody from eachother anyways.
-
Maybe you shouldn't have such weak loyalty to a company that has delivered an amazing story. They ended poorly, they know that. Get over it.
-
I have no loyalty to any game companies. The only franchise I will always buy is Halo. Maybe if the developers didn't develop SHIT, I wouldn't have a reason to complain.
-
Edited by Trick-Star: 9/6/2014 9:59:02 PM[quote]I have no loyalty to any game companies.[/quote] [quote]I will always buy is Halo.[/quote] You're an idiot. I have loyalty to Ubisoft's AC franchise. AC III had terrible gameplay, and then AC IV came out and it's great. Loyalty isn't bad. [quote]Maybe if the developers didn't develop SHIT[/quote] >Bungie's poor story delivery >Halo 2's bug filled engine >Reach's AL/Bloom >Halo 4's Spartan Ops >343i's terrible handle of multiplayer BioWare screwed up at the last second. The rest of the trilogy was great.