-
What part of it? Needing to put them on or the driver being punished for passengers not putting them on?
-
Both.
-
You realize seatbelt laws do protect other people, not just the person without the seatbelt, right?
-
How so?
-
If somebody flies through there windshield and hits another car and dies,it's gunna possible causing damage and mentally and emotionally scarring the occupants. It also protects the insurance companies.
-
If someone is going fast enough in a head on collision to fly through their windshield, wearing a seat belt ain't gonna help making the site look any prettier.
-
In combination with airbags deploying? Yes it will. It might be the only thing saving your life.
-
Edited by Fallen Hero: 2/15/2014 6:55:38 PMOn a serious note, I would wear mine. I still think people have the right to choose whether they do or not.
-
Are you retarded?
-
Not at all.
-
Well since you disagree with seatbelt law I assumed you were because only retarded Neanderthals would disagree with it.
-
Edited by Fallen Hero: 2/15/2014 2:19:05 PMThat's your opinion. I never said I didn't want to wear mine. People who are legal adults should have the choice though. The driver shouldn't be punished for his passengers choice.
-
No they shouldn't. This is one instance where I believe the safety of the issue outweighs the while "mah murican freedom"
-
Why should it?
-
-
I never said children should be able to be unbuckled.
-
Did you even read the part about how costs are higher due to unbelted drivers.
-
Edited by Fallen Hero: 2/15/2014 6:09:27 PM8 billion is pretty small in comparison to how many trillions we spend. If you are worried about costs you should be for banning fast food, sodas, tobacco, alcohol, or anything else that leads to obesity or healthy problems. 2/3's of Americans are over weight or obese which costs far more than a few accidents in comparison to 10 of millions of obese people having expensive surgeries and accommodations. It's also a 16 year old study. Cars are far safer today.
-
You can have the safest car in the world but it still won't stop you from flying into your dash and or windshield. The point still stands the safety benefit far outweighs the "personal freedom of being a retarded Neanderthal."
-
Edited by Fallen Hero: 2/15/2014 6:20:09 PMIt can stop quicker and absorb impact better. Worrying about wrecking is paranoia and the equivalent of worrying about the apocalypse. If it's gonna happen it's gonna happen and there is nothing you can do about it.
-
Edited by DesticleStomper6: 2/15/2014 2:49:41 AMlook at dis foo, he thinks seatbelts aint coo, well lemme tell u sumthing u tool, 1 day yo ass gunna crash, u go "dam i shouldna did dat grass, i shouldve put my seatbelt on at least-sheesh", but reality is u aint gon think shyeet, cuz after dat you gon be brain dead, you just a vegetable, left to drool, watchyoo think of seatbelts now, still not cool?, thats what it thot, gg fool.
-
Edited by Fallen Hero: 2/15/2014 4:42:26 PMListen here you ignoramus I don't know how hard I can strain this You are a fecking cumquat I have the one virtue you do not Principle, as in if it doesn't affect others then let it be God I don't know why this is so hard for some many to see! Does no one know what it means to be free? Clean outcha ears and listen to me I don't give a flying -blam!- if you wear a seat belt or not But I think it's retarded to get a ticket cuz you didn't in a Wal-mart parkin lot Once you 18 it shouldn't matta whether a grown person choose to splatta Or wear a safety belt around his bladda It should be up to their decision Not some political malarky provision 420 legalize prostitution -blam!- that government garble propaganda mind pollution In the end, freedom is the solution
-
Yeah you can be free all you want, flying through the windshield.
-
That would never happen.
-
You never know. Which is why you should wear seatbelts; it's a safety precaution.