I've been watching Ancient Aliens recently, and although some of the stuff it suggests is silly, it raises some valid points.
We know that aliens exist. You have to be pretty arrogant to believe that they don't. There is, in my opinion, a lot of evidence that aliens exist. That is to say, if you subscribe to the concept of uniformitarianism, then planet Earth is evidence for extraterrestrial life.
Expanding on from that, this is what I don't understand. Why is it that a lot of people are very quick to take to the idea of an omnipotent supernatural being as a God and not an alien race? Which is more likely? The aliens. So why is the idea shunned?
Discuss.
-
4 Replies[quote]a lot of evidence that aliens exist.[/quote] Please show me.
-
3 Replies1. That show is full of retards 2. Aliens more than likely exist but they are too far away for any of us to even communicate with them, let alone have any evidence they exist 3. LOL history channel doesn't have actual history
-
4 RepliesEdited by Euler: 5/4/2013 1:20:33 PM[quote]We know that aliens exist. You have to be pretty arrogant to believe that they don't. There is, in my opinion, a lot of evidence that aliens exist. That is to say, if you subscribe to the concept of uniformitarianism, then planet Earth is evidence for extraterrestrial life.[/quote] There is only one sentence remotely intelligent in this paragraph. Guess which one it is. HINT: It's not 1,2 and it's definitely not 4.
-
1 ReplyWhat if the Aliens are the God(s) in which the old history speaks of? Hmmm ; )
-
3 RepliesLikelihood is, if madmen thousands of years ago wrote a story book about aliens it would be believed. But the story book is instead about a magical man in the sky so people believe that