I fully endorse anyone who wants to do whatever they want and go against the meta, but to claim that nothing is op because a good enough player can compete is a fallacious argument.
A good player can take Ganondorf or Bowser to top 8 in a Smash Tournament, but Marth, Shiek, Fox, etc are just objectively better characters in every way.
I see what you're trying to do/ say though.
English
-
I'm claiming nothing is OP, because nothing is OP.
-
What's a 'Bowser'? Did you mean 'Browser' or 'Browsing'?
-
Bowser. Mario's nemesis.
-
I guess my attempt at a shitty joke failed.
-
Edited by GamingAura: 3/1/2016 1:32:24 PMI use many different primaries and the fourth horseman with the unseeing eye as a defender... In PvP too, even with no objective. And I can honestly say I like getting top of the leaderboard without using the huge metas
-
Same.
-
Marth and Sheik get shit on all night, what are you talking about? Zero Suit, Zelda, Ike, Ness and Jigglypuff are the best for anyone with any real skill.
-
Troll post. How to tell it's a troll post: Shiek is still on the top, according to eventhubs tracker. And Bowser and Ganondorf are still worse than the characters I mentioned so your post had next to no relevance.
-
Everyone knows little Mac is da best