Pulled this article from Reddit. Can anyone confirm/deny the additional exclusives in DLC?
I'm fine with timed exclusive gear/weapons. What I'm not okay with is exclusive strikes/crucible maps. That is content in the game that one party is receiving, and another party is not, [b]for the same price[/b].
And I get it, this garbage happened with CoD to PS owners, but even those timed exclusives were only for a month. These are until [b]Fall 2015[/b]! I'm not saying it sucks because I have an XBOne. I'm saying it's a terrible business practice and the gaming industry needs to learn that, no matter which group of console owners is getting burned.
Thoughts?
EDIT: People are saying the raid isn't exclusive, just another strike. That makes more sense, however it doesn't change the principle of the matter: The same price for less content only hurts gamers.
-
5 RepliesI dont mind paying for DLC, I don't even mind having exclusives for PS, but I do feel we shouldn't be charged the same for less content. We do however need to remember that we don't even know if it is true that there will be exclisove content in the PS DLC, nor do we know for a fact that we will be charged the same (though the existence of expansion passes kinda leans toward everyone being charged the same amount).