That is what the feedback forum is for. There are plenty of posts there responding to what they said. It's not like they are silencing the community voice.
English
-
They are silencing or displacing direct criticism, feedback or suggestions from the community for little to no reason. Why cant we comment on these posts as we have for most (if not all) posts that have come before it. They are directly contradicting what they are saying by doing so and allowing themselves and easy way to dodge the feedback I have mentioned in my post. PR would have orchestrated this in order to avoid these topics, which is why they weren't present and hard to comment on. While feedback forums are good they never acknowledge feedback and the promises given are vague made to direct attention away from the problems they are not addressing. So yes while the feedback forums is for this the way this situation has been constructed and implemented works against a good flow of feedback between both parties.
-
After considering, I see your point.
-
Thank you and although I didn't agree with yours I understand how you arrived at it.
-
They are they aren't paying attending to the feed back that's why he said its a restriction to the feed back policy are you not paying attention?
-
Yeah but now we have 50 threads all saying the same thing instead of it all being in one place. Makes posting about anything else impossible.
-
Hm, good point. Still, there are always those same few (or several) posts that are always at the top of the just, blocking out the useful stuff.