JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

12/6/2017 10:11:19 AM
7
Don't know if anyone else cared or cares to mention it but lore wise this doc is a -blam!-ing home to what the Dark Below was. Also the fact that these 2 dlc released 3 years apart, after lessons should have been learned, are comparable is proof enough of how good this dlc isn't. Ffs it should have been free
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • English

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • What lessons? A $20 dlc isn't gonna solve every problem in the game, nor is it going to give you reasons to play for the rest of the year. No developer does that for a $20 dlc

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I'm not asking for the rest of the year in asking for more content than 10 hours worth. Believe it or not, there are developers that do. -blam!- I mean there are modders that do that for skyrim for free. The lessons i reference is that ongoing fact we've ended up in a weird version of year one. It is being compared to dark below. That means it is not good. Dark below had redeeming qualities and it was their first year working with destiny, we had the goodwill to allow hiccups. It is now year 4, goodwill is all but gone. They chose to make the suboptimal dlc that is CoO. If they didn't have the time they should not have done it, if they had to because of Activision I feel no remorse for them because they still could have put some passion into it at least. Or you know make the story make a bit of sense or have a bit of grandeur or just explain what the developing he'll is going one, dark below at least had the courtesy to have grimoire for explanations.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by AlexsOranges: 12/6/2017 1:54:00 PM
    No matter what they’ve learned, it is just as hard to make content in the time frame they have.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • What? 7 1/2 years isn't enough time? Srsly? Bungie and Activision entered into contract April 2010. Bungie began Destiny at that time. I DO believe that is MORE than enough time for what's been pushed to market. This next April will be 8 years!! 8 years isn't enough time?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by AlexsOranges: 12/7/2017 4:50:59 AM
    Yeah. They’ve only been working on this DLC for a few months. They are working fast, Activision makes them meet strict deadlines.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Good, glad somebody is making them meet deadlines. What have they been doing past 7 years? Drinking martinis? No, if they srsly just began development of this first dlc a few months ago when we know D2 was started in 2014 after D1 was handed over to what we now call the live team, then Bungie is full of lazy, slow, incompetent time managers. I will NEVER allow anybody to last minute a project to me bc they didn't prepare for the future. Nope.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon