if the size seems justifiable then it doesnt bother me. BF4 being like 50 gigs doesnt bother me, halo mcc being 60 (?) gigs is kinda eh, and halo 5 being 100 gigs is outrageous (dont even start with "but they have..."). if, say, a game like skyrim but better was 100 gigs, then okay, but not halo 5. its got too little to offer for its size.
English
-
I'm with you on Halo 5. I have games on my HDD that are half that install, but they're bigger, longer and contain way more content than Halo 5. The size of that file is ridiculous for what you get with it.
-
He's talking about in-game scale and length, but it's great to see that you're still rambling about this.
-
Hasn't the OP said basically nothing confirming what size means? He might say it in the video, but no one bothers to watch it, so ops fault.
-
Edited by Capt Explodabob: 2/16/2017 6:16:19 AM[quote]We talk about if scale & graphics sell games![/quote][quote]Does scale & graphics matter to you?[/quote][quote]1st Part | Does Scale & Graphics Sell Games?[/quote] It helps if you read past the title. [quote]He might say it in the video, but no one bothers to watch it, so ops fault.[/quote] No, that's on you.
-
nice to see youre still rambling about it too
-
About you not comprehending the topics pertaining to the posts? Thanks.
-
rambling on about "halo 5 is the right size for the game" or more particularly "you dont know what youre talking about" without any real evidence. a games size could mean literal storage size or figurative content size. both are legitimate options without further explanation, but then again you only stick to your assumptions.
-
Edited by Capt Explodabob: 2/13/2017 8:37:58 AM[quote]rambling on about "halo 5 is the right size for the game"...[/quote]Funny, considering that I at no point mentioned Halo 5, and certainly would have put it more eloquently than that. [quote]without any real evidence.[/quote]Funny again, considering that you were the one who stopped posting after I said, verbatim, "prove it, bud". Your logic is akin to those theocrats who claim that God is real even though no supporting evidence exists, yet conclude that non-realism is illogical blasphemy. This is made [i]even[/i] funnier when you quantify file ‘size’ using videogame ‘scale’ without any apparent knowledge― or accounting― of reoccurring assets whilst purporting that you [i]do[/i], in fact know what you're talking about. [quote]you only stick to your assumptions.[/quote] You say "assumptions", the world says "facts"; tomayto, tomahto. [quote]both are legitimate options without further explanations...[/quote] Yet such clarification exists ― all you had to do was actually read his post or take the thirty seconds it took me to listen to him say it himself.
-
are you as stupid as that picture? wait, the answers gotta be yes, because facts are arbitrary now
-
I don't know. Are you as edgy as your generic username would imply? How about as myopic as your flimsy comment would imply? Yes on both accounts, I think. [quote]facts are arbitrary now[/quote] You said it...