Firstly.....it's Rise of Iron
Secondly every dlc so far has added to the pvp game in one way or another with the introduction of new match types (though can't remember if Dark Below added anything)
Thirdly, it's the pvp community in Destiny that's amongst the most cancerous in gaming, the constant cries for nerds, ruining perfectly balanced weapons, ruining those weapons effectiveness in PvE along side subclasses and abilities.
Personally I agree that the introduction of new match types would be fun, but as for ranking and sbmm, honestly forget it unless Bungie/Activision decide to actually invest in dedicated servers, everytime they've "tweaked" anything regarding sbmm ect, it's in fact made playability in pvp even worse despite their claims.
English
-
The only real change was for Trials back in HoW. Without the pvp keeping this community afloat in down times it would have died a long time ago. If anything all the pve players should be thanking the pvp players for keeping the player base alive when you all go play Witcher, Fallout and Dark Souls.
-
Thirdly, it's the pvp community in Destiny that's amongst the most cancerous in gaming, the constant cries for nerds, ruining perfectly balanced weapons, ruining those weapons effectiveness in PvE along side subclasses and abilities. I think you mean BUNGIE who doesn't separate pvp and pve that ruin weapons on the pve side
-
Edited by Angelus-B-: 6/2/2016 12:19:17 PMI agree, but most calls for nerfs are pvp related, yea icebreaker and black hammer are probably the 2 biggest pve nerfs in an attempt to stop folk just camping out sniping strike bosses and skolas plus the demise of Gjallarhorn
-
Of course they are mainly PVP related, because PVP players want it to be as balanced as it possibly can. They do nothing in regards to making changes in PVE though. Putting blame on them is just misguided
-
pvp players are the only ones who dont eat straight up garbage bungie gives. pve just eat everythin and want everything to be op