{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/3/2012 12:54:45 AM
52
Did Bungie mean to end the Halo series with Halo 3?
Let me elaborate. I'm wondering if Bungie meant for the Halo 3 ending to be the true ending to the Halo series, that 343's Halo games would mean nothing. Did Bungie leave the Halo 3 ending unexplained so that 343 could continue it, or did they do it to bring the "true" Halo story to a close that was up for interpretation? Will Bungie consider the next Halo games to be true Halo?
I've been wondering what Bungie thinks of 343 continuing the series, that is unless Bungie meant to close the Halo story with the third installment.
Uh...discuss where you think 343 is going with the next Halo games.
-
Its not REACH, it's a Shield World, they were the next best thing to the halo rings, and they can block the blast from killing you... leading me to believe we will find forrunners inhabiting this "planet", along with sentinels and a new fight. That was not REACH, and Reach is glassed, though, It's possible they went back and rebuilt many things there, however, it was not.
