Yeah, uh, no. Evidence is only part of it. In order for Darwin to reach his final theory, he used a lot of reasoning to determine the most logical of the possibilities of what happened. The evidence is comprehendible unless you're an idiot. I'm not saying people today are as smart as Darwin. It's much much harder to look at the evidence and create a sound theory than it is to look at the evidence and see how it fits with a theory that is already proposed. Of course, you can't actually prove Darwinian evolution because it is a THEORY, and a theory is something that has been supported many many times with no evidence against it. It supports Darwinian evolution, but only in part, as reasoning is needed to connect the evidence to the theory. Most evidence is straight forward either.