I take all news outlets at face value. I enjoy watching O'Reilly from time to time not because I think he's such a swell dude (he's really a pompous, egotistical ass) but because he has interesting topics sometimes. Plus Watter's World is always really hilarious. Megyn Kelly is cool too, I respect her more than anyone on TV. She's been doing awesome coverage on Ferguson and has been asking a lot of really hard questions that libtards aren't up to asking (or answering for that matter). I can't stand Sean Hannity. He is just........ ugh. He just annoys me. He is arguably worse than O'Reilly and really represents the pinnacle of this awful dual party dichotomy. I read a lot of news from the Guardian, Huffington Post, New York Times etc because the vast amount of columnists they have gives you a much broader range of opinions than most TV can. So to answer your question as to who's the worst, I can't say. Most TV news outlets are very biased either way, and even when they are, they have so many different contributors who have their own temperaments and opinions that it's difficult to blame the TV station itself. Fox news does have a terrible history of being extremely, EXTREMELY biased but I think they're making a strong effort to change that. They aren't trying to hide the fact that they're right leaning, but they always include both sides of the story, ALWAYS (except for a few rare instances). Of course the news anchors have their own opinions but they always bring people on with opposing views. But like I said, I take everything at face value and I don't trust anyone's opinion until I know the facts.