{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/8/2014 8:51:50 PM
9
Would be even better if we could exchange 2 of the same color for a type we want. Example: 2 purple class engrams for 1 purple primary engram.
English
-
Nah bad idea. Makes game too easy. With so little to do we don't need it any easier to get what we want.
-
Making the game unnecessarily hard isn't the answer to extending it's lifetime. The answer is more content.
-
Doesn't make it hard just means u need to play not take short cuts.
-
When the rewards system is entirely based on RNG, just playing the game doesn't guarantee anything. Having control over the game, even a little, being able to focus on specific goals and maintain a genuine sense of direction and objective, rather than aimlessly trying everything in hopes of even the most meager reward.
-
Problem is even though you make good points it would speed up getting what u want and the game Is already so limited on stuff to do
-
I don't disagree, but as is, progress is just being stifled by poor reward systems.
-
What happens when they release an unfinished game.
-
i would rather see this than turning god-awful green engrams into it blues, then the blues into legendarys Makes more sense
-
Yeah thats a good idea, give you a bit more control
