{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/25/2014 4:12:11 PM
1
Oh bull crap. Have you not seen the videos of people accessing the Terminus? The glitch that showed all the DLC planned out and it's content? What about people accessing locations in the Beta?
English
-
Just because a location is in the game doesn't mean the content is finished. It's completely reasonable that the maps were done first, and level design such as enemy locations and and encounters were not finished. Did you not see the placeholders that didn't even have names for the missions? And no descriptions? You really think the final raid is called Reef Raid? What about the fact that it's a plan? DeeJ straight up denied that it was finished. You need to stop speculating, do some independent research on other games and the process of building them, and stick with the facts.
-
And why should I have to pay for them again to have the privilege of playing something that should have been there in the first place? And explain King's Watch, an area that is well near completion and already has enemies? I have indeed done "independent research" nor am I "speculating" if it's already in the game I should have what came with the game. This isn't "planning ahead" this is having unfinished areas you've already put in the game and plan to charge me for later.
-
How do you know, with 100% certainty, that just because the map of the area is done, the entire story mission is done? Games leave stuff on the disc that isn't finished all the time, because it makes it easier to update later. The area has a few enemies in it, with placeholder names, and no coherent layout. Go ahead and play through that "mission" and tell me how done it is. Maps can be finished without the level itself being done. This has been stated a million times. Y'all are so eager to find something to shout and scream about that you disregard facts in favor of pure speculation.
-
Only a fool believes anything 100%. Are you 100% positive they didn't cut it?
-
No, how could I be I'm not a part of the development team? However, there are for more logical explanations that are less inflammatory than that they cut it to make money. People just like to have something to complain about. Are you 100% positive they did?
-
Absolutely not. Most of us live in the grey, not black or white. Since I am not 100% on this, I understand speculation
-
Then why are you acting on the speculation like it is fact? I am acting on what logically makes sense, which is that the content was by completely finished.
-
What makes you think I'm acting on speculation like its fact? And as far as making sense, it makes a lot of sense that they couldn't make their deadline for whatever reason and cut content and gutted the story to make their deadline. Like a whole dollar worth i cents
-
What makes you say I am acting on speculation like fact?
-
Key words. "Near completion"
