I'm not sure if you were/are a Mass Effect fan but, when the 3rd game launched there was a collective "WTF!" outcry at the ending of the game. As a result, in an unprecedented move by a big time developer, BioWare announced that they would patch the ending to "clear up some ambiguity and have a tighter sense of closure". In the interim fans combed through in-game codex and cutscenes to arrive at what became known as "[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ythY_GkEBck]The Indoctrination Theory[/url]" to try and make sense of it all. Commander Shepard was speculated to actually have become Indoctrinated (read mind controlled) by the game's big baddies. It was thus presented that the vast majority of the ending of Act 3 of the game was ACTUALLY happening in Commander Shepard's mind and the events on the screen were NOT literal physical reality but was Shepard trying to overcome (or succumb) to the effects of the Indoctrination. This theory was put together by the community and was very VERY convincing as it used in-game evidence to support it. However, it was debunked with BioWare's official release of the official redesigned ending. This is essentially what you've done here with your Destiny theory. You're connecting dots and proposing connections based on limited game knowledge and speculation. That might work in a game world like Dark Souls where it's done with some degree of competency but I honestly don't think Bungie are that masterful with the indirect narrative angle. Also, your synopssis is confusing since your references aren't directly quoted and your explanations are just expected to be taken at face value. Maybe a video would be a better format for you to describe this? [b]TL;DR[/b] - Intruiging speculation but presented without clear support. We've been here before with Mass Effect 3 's Indoctrination Theory.