More often than not, this is true... But then people who suck generally aren't going to be involved in any serious or in-depth conversation about K/D ratios or PvP, as they will be too busy ranting about unbalanced it is... Which brings me to my second point: Validity is entirely dependent on one's agenda. If you're frustrated with your performance in PvP, do you: [b]A)[/b] [i]Jump on the forums and lament about how unbalanced it is?/Put together a petition to have x, y, or z nerfed?/Engage in some other online activity to rally other like-minded PvP-deficient individuals to your cause?[/i] [b]B)[/b] [i]Search/Solicit the forums for posts which contain information or tips on how to improve your performance, while weeding through the endless supply of asshats who post troll responses?[/i] Plenty of people fit into either category, but those in Category B will likely ignore posts from those in Category A and vice versa, simply because they don't fit their respective agendas. Category A's agenda is to find company with which to alleviate their misery, while Category B's agenda is to wade through the countless dickwads who tell them that they suck, in the hopes of finding those nuggets of gold that will help them up their game. Category B would put more stock in the advice of someone with a High K/D ratio, because that is what they're looking for.