{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/27/2014 3:44:49 AM
4
To believe that it cost $150k for some extremely weak arguments. She made a point or two there, only for them to be covered in a frenzy of godawful arguments that she refuses to allow debate over.
English
-
[quote]arguments that she refuses to allow debate over.[/quote]You realize you can have discussions on online forums like this... right?
-
>Youtube comments disabled >Ratings disabled You knew exactly what I was talking about.
-
Since when are you entitled to be allowed to comment on her video or give the video a rating? Youtube is a private site with a very public audience, much more likely to fill the comments section with -blam!- jokes and death threats among other lesser forms of slander. If you really had feedback for her, there are ways of contacting her like on Twitter or through her website. You're really not being silenced.
-
[response to this debate has been disabled. You can send a private message] [spoiler]Trolls, misogynists, and threats aside, it's pretty ridiculous to make a bunch of bold public statements, and then only allow the subject of debate to be done selectively or in complete privacy. It's not about entitlement, it's a matter of being able to stand behind your words and appearing credible. In this current debate that you and I are having, if you completely proved me wrong and made me look like an ass, but I was doing what she was doing, I'd be making it a complete chore for anyone to see how flawed I am, which greatly influences public opinion.[/spoiler]
