{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/5/2014 5:37:06 PM
2
1. scorpion and wraith didn't move as fast
2. scorpion wasn't as maneuverable as the interceptor
3.both the scorpion and the wraith had a much slower fire rate than the interceptor
4. there was this thing called Highjacking in halo, making it easy to destroy an unsuspecting tank.
The only similarity that it has to the tanks of halo is the role it plays. You have to deal with it in a completely different way than you would a scorpion or wraith. If anything, you deal with the interceptor the same way you deal with the ghost or prowler from halo 3. The interceptor is NOT a true tank, it is merely the closest to a tank role in the game.
I'm not saying its difficult to handle or anything. There are plenty of ways to take out or avoid it. But the interceptor just can't really be compared to the tanks of halo. both the ways they function and the strategies used to deal with them are completely different.
English
-
[quote]4. there was this thing called Highjacking in halo, making it easy to destroy an unsuspecting tank.[/quote] Only thing I can say to this is: Busted! In case you don't know that: It's a halo medal for when someone hijacks you, but you manage to kill them anyways before they could destroy you.
-
well that's a different satisfaction altogether. a feat difficult enough to achieve that it deserves a medal.
