{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:Secular Sevens
4/4/2014 3:23:07 AM
9
-
Did you even read the thread?
-
Yes. The ignorance of it hurt my head a bit, but, yes, I did read it.
-
Well as I was explaining to someone else, the double slit experiment is probably a weak and unlikely example (it's just the most interesting). I'm just bringing up the possibility that our brains may manipulate information and we're not even aware of it.
-
Whatever you're trying to do, you're demonstrating your ignorance of quantum mechanics at every opportunity. This stuff is what you'd get if Deepak Chopra were a pop-scientist.
-
You're making this difficult by not explaining anything you're disagreeing with.
-
Edited by Seggi: 4/4/2014 3:59:19 AMYour entire concept of QM hinging on human perception is way off. The predictions you're talking about (i.e. observation and what's usually conceived of as wave function collapse) are notions built on a mathematically rigorous foundation, not "hey when we looked at this something weird happened".
-
Edited by Le Dustin xddddd: 4/4/2014 4:08:25 AMSo as I said, the double slit experiment probably isn't the best example, it was just the most interesting. It's a field of science with a lot we still need to learn. I'm just saying that it might be possible that our human perception may be making it more difficult to understand and we're not aware of it. I'm not trying to force the notion that this is happening, I'm just saying it could be, and we should be open to that possibility since it's affected our knowledge of science in the past. And with math it's a lot less likely, but there is a lot more to quantum mechanics.
-
This is why I didn't bother telling you what was wrong when I told you: you're just going to keep spouting bullshit and being vague because you've got no clue what you're talking about and no amount of explanation is going to sate your appetite for dumb pseudo-science.
-
The only claim I made was that x could be happening. You're getting rash because you don't like that I brought up quantum mechanics as an example. The fact of the matter is that I could have referenced a million other things instead and it wouldn't have changed my point.
