{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/6/2014 12:20:35 PM
7
Maybe people like to play video games for fun and can careless about winning or losing.
English
-
Edited by Wonderbread: 2/7/2014 5:53:52 AMFun is subjective. I find playing to win in a competitive, close game far more enjoyable than just playing it.
-
That's why they have the social aspect of the game. You don't have to go try hard MLG pro to win games. Social was essentially a casual playlist, ranked is for if you want to give it your all and try to win.
-
Yeah but usually the ranked and mlg playlist always had a small number of gamers playing compared to social. It seemed like a waste
-
You obviously didn't play Halo 3 in its prime.
-
I actually did . I was without a job and that's all I did for a year is play halo
-
Then you should know that both had large populations when Halo 3 was in its prime. If I remember correctly social normally had more players in it, but just because social had more than ranked doesn't mean ranked was a complete waste. Sometimes I felt like ranking up and trying to get that 50, other times I wanted to chill and play the game without worrying about losing that rank.
-
I don't remember the exact number but recall social always being higher. I meant from a developers aspects it might have been a waste. To put the time into competitive aspect when there was more people in social compared to rank
