JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
12/24/2013 3:15:21 AM
5

Dammit, America...

[url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/21/faith-in-scientists_n_4481487.html?utm_hp_ref=science]Article[/url] [quote]How much faith do Americans have in scientists and science journalists? Not a whole lot, a new survey finds. In a new HuffPost/YouGov poll, only 36 percent of Americans reported having "a lot" of trust that information they get from scientists is accurate and reliable. Fifty-one percent said they trust that information only a little, and another 6 percent said they don't trust it at all. Science journalists fared even worse in the poll. Only 12 percent of respondents said they had a lot of trust in journalists to get the facts right in their stories about scientific studies. Fifty-seven percent said they have a little bit of trust, while 26 percent said they don't trust journalists at all to accurately report on scientific studies. What’s more, many Americans worry that the results of scientific studies are sometimes tainted by political ideology -- or by pressure from the studies’ corporate sponsors. A whopping 78 percent of Americans think that information reported in scientific studies is often (34 percent) or sometimes (44 percent) influenced by political ideology, compared to only 18 percent who said that happens rarely (15 percent) or never (3 percent).[/quote] Given the recent trend of schools emphasizing the STEM fields, you would think that the American public would be more trusting of science. Or maybe the reason why we've started focusing on these subjects is because of the mistrust in science. I wonder exactly what the study means by "science journalist", though. I wonder if people who took the poll confused them with news reporters who often sensationalize scientific news.

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • This is different from saying Americans don't trust science; journalists and reporters in America do in fact warp scientific studies to achieve interesting news stories, and many studies done are in fact for political or corporate reasons.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • It's not science, it's our beautiful politics

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Given how corrupt American politics have become, I'm not surprised people are skeptical over it being tainted by it.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by Stalwart: 12/24/2013 3:48:57 AM
    Science is near infallible. Scientists, on the other hand... They are dreadfully human, and completely fallible.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • 0
    I think this may be a direct effect of the media's sensationalizing of information in scientific research. Everyone has heard or made the joke of "Oh no! Air is going to give me cancer next!" when referring to news stories. They're quick to tell you that something is going to be the greatest thing since penicillin, or the death of all mankind. As these stories become more joke than information, the perception could easily be shifted toward science as well in the eyes of the average american. I dunno. Just rambling.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon