{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/23/2013 7:08:46 PM
2
What if, for argument's sake, we assume that anthropological climate change is not real.
What do we have to lose by treating our planet better for future generations?
English
-
A loss of money, land, and usable technologies. If his claim that we are not causing climate change is indeed true, things will change. There will still be problems like over-fishing and stuff, but now all those CO2 taxes/laws and smog tests dissipate. And trust in Eco-friendly/green ways of life will falter and possibly topple. Much of the modern green revolution started around climate change and much of it still does.
-
Im not saying stop trying to make the planet better, just that the whole concept of man made or man influenced climate change is pure arrogance on the part of the human race.
