JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#Gaming

Edited by Pillar Of Awesom: 4/26/2013 4:23:37 PM
1

On Rumours Being Used as Sources

Why do you trust articles from "Gaming journalism" sites which cite "unnamed sources" and "rumours"? From what I can see any site can easily make up rumours and post inflammatory articles in an effort to gather pageviews. We've seen RPS do this before with the Bungie interview. So why do you still take articles citing rumours as sources as fact? So many people actually believe that always-online for the 720 is confirmed and Destiny will have paid subscription already. Also, let's have a general discussion about gaming journalism. -Pillar

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Because it makes people feel like they're ahead of the curve. The truth is very little leaked information ends up being true compared to the mountainous amounts of tripe thrown around daily...

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon