{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Recon Number 54:
2/16/2013 7:11:52 PM
33
BF3 VS MW3
Ahh this old topic. Back when almost every other topic was this one, people pointlessly arguing which one would be better.
But now, looking back, which of these two games would you say was better?
-
Oh my god, battlefield 3 by far. I didn't really like either of them, but it's hard for me to even call MW3 a game.
-
Halo Reach.
-
2 RepliesBF3 Why? It offered more of a challenge and a more immerse experience multiplayer wise.
-
I had way more fun on MW3.
-
BF3. It's the only shooter on consoles that offers a mix of infantry and vehicle combat on a larger scale. Halo has the mix too, but even their biggest maps don't match the scale of Caspian or Firestorm. Don't get me wrong, BF3 dropped the ball in a few places (Destruction 3.0), but at least there was more to it than camping in a corner until you got an airstrike and letting killstreaks do the rest.
-
MW3's campaign was worlds better than BF3's, but MW3's multiplayer would have been better if it didn't exist. BF3's multiplayer is still one of the great online experiences.
-
MW3 was trash.
-
I was never a big fan of either to be completely honest.
-
Edited by BerzerkCommando: 5/26/2013 12:26:10 PMI really haven't played MW3, but I know enough so BF3. Also you are comparing 2 completely games. One is just solder combat and the other is this massive solider and vehicle combat.
-
Halo 3 better than both.
-
-
I'm now playing MW3 non-stop for weeks. But before that I was playing BF3 for the longest time. They're both as much fun to play.
-
Well, since MW3 was only good for campaign, Battlefield wins.
-
BF3 All cod games are 80% copy and pasted with new storyline and multiplayer aspects. Battlefield makes progress, I cant wait for battlefield 4, screw cod please.
-
3 RepliesEA: "This game is going to be way better than COD guys!" *makes battlefield 3 a cod clone with shiny grapics* In other words, neither, because their both the same goddamn thing.
-
BF3. MW3 was complete trash as far as balance is concerned. The campaign is pretty much the only good thing about it.
-
2 RepliesModern Warfare 3. It is the best Call of Duty ever though the graphics and maps are quite a bit better on Black Ops 2 but Modern Warfare 3 has Spec Ops which is good as I quite like survival.
-
lolmw3 BF3 of course
-
Bf3 is bearable. I was infuriated at MW3, the maps blew harder than hurricane Sandy, The MP7 and ACR were god weapons, and spec ops was a shitstain in comparison to Zombies. Oh, and the campaign was trash, although the same can be said for BF3. At least BF3 doesn't have shit hit detection.
-
Battlefield 3 is better, but it is no way a great game itself.
-
1 ReplyThey're the exact same game, except BF3 has sun glare, and somewhat better hit detection.
-
BF3 was WAY BETTER!
-
Relevant
-
Halo 3.
-
3 RepliesEdited by EU Itazuki: 2/16/2013 3:34:51 PM[URL=http://www.quakelive.com/#!home]Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race, Quake Live Master Race![/url]
-
Well, being that MW3, was quite possibly the most horrible shooter game I've ever had the displeasure of playing, and BF3 entertained me for some time, BF3 easily.
