JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
originally posted in:Mythic Members
Edited by Primo84: 2/3/2013 3:12:33 PM
19

Halo 5 Theory (Spoilers)

[quote]"Last time, you asked me, if it was my choice, would I do it? Having had considerable time to ponder your query, my answer has not changed. There is no choice. We must activate the ring." "More or less. Technically, this installation's pulse has a maximum effective radius of twenty-five thousand light years. But, once the others follow suit, this galaxy will be quite devoid of life, or at least any life with sufficient biomass to sustain the Flood. But you already knew that... I mean, how couldn't you?" "You are the child of my Makers. Inheritor of all they left behind. You are Forerunner! But this ring... is mine!" - 343 Guilty Spark.[/quote]Why would 343 GS confuse John for a Forerunner so many times? Is he crazy? That's the popular opinion, but why point that out time and time again? Why reintroduce 343 GS in [i]Primordium[/i] after he was supposedly killed in Halo 3, and reveal that a Forerunner AI isn't always localized to one construct? It seems like a very significant plot point, yet it's never been fully addressed. What if 343 Guilty Spark wasn't as crazy as he seemed? I'm calling it: in Halo 5, the changes the Librarian made to Chief's physiology fully manifest and unlock his Geas: the Bornstellar Didact. If I recall correctly, even the humans in [i]Cryptum[/i] and [i]Primordium[/i] had to have their Geas unlocked in some way, why not Chief? What if the Librarian did more than grant the Chief an immunity to The Composer, and just didn't have time to fill Chief in about his Geas what with The Didact finding them?

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon