[url=http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/24/dems-reintroduce-assault-weapons-ban-and-its-not-just-rifles-purpose-is-to-dry-up-the-supply-of-these-weapons-over-time/]article here[/url]
gee, they said they were going after "assault' rifles but it seems that their going after handguns as well...
-
Depends on how we're looking at "the list". It appears that the proposed bill wants a national registry of any centerfire rifles able to accept a detachable magazine? If I am reading the links correctly and the bill passes both houses with that clause intact? I forsee a lot of "insurance claims" and reports of "lost or stolen" rifles.
-
I don't own a gun.
-
Lol, good luck to anyone who tries to take my guns.
-
No, I don't own superflous types of weapons. And the 'handguns' they are going after are machine pistols, smgs and the like. No one is banning reasonable semiauto pistols or revolvers.
-
Lol, they have at least 2 pistol caliber carbines on that list of 'Assault Weapons" No military in the world issues those to anyone. Dumbasses. - Der
-
No, none of our guns are on the ban list because the bill explicitly excludes firearms that are possessed legally at the time of enactment. Not getting into the politics of this, just pointing that out.
-
Edited by Vicex: 1/25/2013 12:02:58 AMIt's stupid and won't pass.... but yes.
-
>theblaze lololololololol
-
>Has no gun Well, my uncle has a few guns, but I think he's good.
-
Lol, nope. My rifle isn't on that list, so I can still use it to go hunting.
-
Yes, I think so. We try to go deer and dove hunting every year or so. Like we're ever going to give them up though.
-
This is going to suck.
-
DatBritfagFeel
-
lolTheBlaze
-
Nah mine doesn't have a deadly cosmetic grip on it.
-
I have no guns on the ban list because I don't own pointless firearms. All of mine are fine.
-
shit, i hope not