{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/23/2012 4:04:52 AM
32
Well then, the laws have been reversed for one girl.
[url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/21/savannah-dietrich-faces-charges_n_1692374.html][quote]A Kentucky girl who was -blam!-ly assaulted could face contempt of court charges after she tweeted the names of her juvenile attackers.
Savannah Dietrich, the 17-year-old victim, was frustrated by a plea deal reached late last month by the two boys who assaulted her, and took to Twitter to expose them--violating a court order to keep their names confidential.[/quote][/url]
She pledged to not say their names, and did so anyhow. As much as I hate people who break pledges and allegiances to somethings, this is just stupid by the court. They molested her knocked-out form and then gave out pictures after the assault. This is just sad..
[Edited on 07.22.2012 8:09 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] tha man A rule is a rule. If a guy blew up a whole building full of kitties, [b][u]and the police arrested the guy and forgot to say his Miranda rights, the guy would be let go.[/b][/u] Even though it is 100% wrong to ever do that to a person, you can't just say the names of people WHO HAVE NOT YET BEEN LEGALLY SENTENCED/OFFICIALLY FELONS that's why they're in court, to be proven guilty/not guilty. It is her fault, she did not listen to the rule, she pays the punishment. [/quote]Technically not true. Miranda rights are read for interrogations, not arrests. Not reading them the rights or not explaining them properly would get the interrogation deemed inadmissable, but it won't let the perp walk. [Edited on 07.22.2012 8:20 PM PDT]
