{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/23/2012 4:04:52 AM
32
Well then, the laws have been reversed for one girl.
[url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/21/savannah-dietrich-faces-charges_n_1692374.html][quote]A Kentucky girl who was -blam!-ly assaulted could face contempt of court charges after she tweeted the names of her juvenile attackers.
Savannah Dietrich, the 17-year-old victim, was frustrated by a plea deal reached late last month by the two boys who assaulted her, and took to Twitter to expose them--violating a court order to keep their names confidential.[/quote][/url]
She pledged to not say their names, and did so anyhow. As much as I hate people who break pledges and allegiances to somethings, this is just stupid by the court. They molested her knocked-out form and then gave out pictures after the assault. This is just sad..
[Edited on 07.22.2012 8:09 PM PDT]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Swiftkillswitch3 In essence yes, because of the fact that they removed her First Amendment. She couldn't name them off, in a pact that she was never told about. They (the court and two boys) made an agreement that she was never told about, which is against many things within the judiciary system.[/quote] LMAO! You're an idiot! A) That does not break the First amendment. B) You are told you're rights and other issues IN THE COURT and not only that but usually a good lawyer will also tell her.
