[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Jin Kisaragi [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Doc Bacon So the relationship between the two was consensual, it was statutory -blam!- not forced. The article should really enunciate that. This really changes the situation, honestly he should be able to see the child then. And the girl is trying to act like she is better than him? She is stupid for -blam!- him at 14, and he is stupid for getting involved with a 14 year old. Regardless, he has the right to see his consensual child.[/quote] When it comes to the court system, its legally impossible for a minor to consent to sex.[/quote] Which is stupid. This article paints him as a violent sex offender and this girl as a victim. The girl had sex with her older sisters boyfriend, and is now an innocent victim? "This was a young girl. Way, way beneath the age of consent," Murphy said. "If the judge thinks this isn't as serious as a stranger -blam!-, and if this is a judge saying to himself, I wouldn't have done this if it had been a stranger in a dark alley,' then that's a judge that maybe shouldn't be sitting on criminal cases" So this person is saying that consensual underage sex is as bad as being assaulted and raped in an alley? This article is full of pro-feminist bias and ignorance