[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] adamj004 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] grey101 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] OrderedComa at least in regards to story, it wasn't really much like Halo at all.[/quote] Which is pure Bullspit, if you are going to try saying halo 3 was better than halo 4 you need to leave. [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Spartan1995324 Not one level on a small part of a Halo.[/quote] So halo 3 is better because it arbitrarily throws a halo in at the end? The only thing that even saves bungie on that part was because cortana still had the original index which we were all wondering about. Seeing as the Ark was originally in Earth this wasn't what they were going to do from the start. You guys over do the importance of a halo ring based off nostalgia. Fighting innies would be just as important. [/quote] The ark wasnt on earth just the portal/gateway to the ark was on earth. And I think Halo 3 was way better than Halo 4, to me it was a lot more memorable and just a better story. Halo 4 left very lackluster and anti climatic. Things in it just felt very random and I a got a feeling of dissatisfaction. Too may things were going on at the same time and in a short amount of time. The story felt very messy and too chaotic with all the stuff going on, it just felt it was crammed in and it felt very rushed. We've got elites who are still enemies, figuring out what the prometheans knights, walkers etc are then finding out they where composed humans, cortanas rampancy, didacts motives, the librarian telling us their plans, the human forerunner war from the terminals. Its all too much in a short space of time, It's not that I dont understand the story because I do it's just too much, too fast, too soon. If they had given the campaign more levels so the story could spread out a bit, slow down a little and unfold naturally with out the impression it was thrown together I would probably have liked it more. And whats with the stupid "if you think Halo 3 is better than halo 4 you should leave" remark, grow up will ya.[/quote] Did you read what i said? The word "originally" is in there. Everything you just said about halo 4 directly apples to halo 3. Halo 2 nor halo 3 really showed what was going on groundside nor did it really make you feel like there was anything wrong. The UNSC didn't seem to be investing during the ground war which is odd since it was earth and the UNSC normally flourishes during ground engagements. Doesn't explain the alliance to start with nor does it explain why we are only allied with the elites. Nothing explains the events after halo 2 and before halo 3. It wasn't explained how the MACs are still somehow up despite the gaps within them. Why are the covenant even fighting in space when they can just jump [b]below[/b] the MACs? It wasn't explained how the hell high charity even got to the Ark (which was really crappy) or how cortana even really knew of it. The entire game gives me a headache. [i]We spend 3 pointless missions on earth,then move to the ark,then to high charity, then to 04[/i] Does that even look right? Too many locations which is exactly why 343I had majority of the game on requiem and [b]explained[/b] why were were going to the next location. And what is with you commenting on my response to someone else? Clearly there is a reason i am pointing her out which she knows as well.