{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/13/2012 8:51:17 PM
54
Halo 4 still Number 2 in online Charts
[url=http://majornelson.com/2012/12/13/live-activity-for-week-of-dec-3/]I'm really not surprised[/url]. I have no damn idea why people judged this game by it's daily peak when Halo: Reach was still getting 600,000 players a day back in March.
-
Lol after reading the websites.
-
[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAMZjv1UZuU]mfw[/url]
-
So, what happened to all those people laughing at Halo and saying it failed?
-
This thread needs this link: [url]http://www.halocharts.com/2012/chart/dailypeakpopulation/all[/url] [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] alex0612 Yes! Mods are asleep! Trololololo-bump.[/quote] Heh. Wish there was a Porch thread personaly. [Edited on 12.13.2012 4:04 PM PST]
-
Sorry for my disrespect, mods. Thank you for the amazing title. [Edited on 12.13.2012 4:04 PM PST]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] alex0612 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Lightning Yuna Well, the list could always be full of -blam!-... Considering it comes from MS... Just saying.[/quote]If it was, then Halo 4 would be at the top.[/quote] Nah that would make it too obvious. Though I doubt the list isn't accurate.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Lightning Yuna Well, the list could always be full of -blam!-... Considering it comes from MS... Just saying.[/quote]If it was, then Halo 4 would be at the top.
-
I thought halo 4 was dying guys. what happened? lol
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] alex0612 [url=http://web.archive.org/web/20080205191422/http://www.bungie.net/default.aspx]First Link. Feb 8th, 2008. Look to the left and keep scrolling down.[/url] More incoming.[/quote] What am suppose to see that is disproving my statement since it is just backing up my post?
-
Well, the list could always be full of -blam!-... Considering it comes from MS... Just saying.
-
Halo 4 still sucks.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Suikoden [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] iTWi2Tid It's funny how it's proven #2 in activity and people are still trying to hate and argue about it![/quote] Well it is sad that the game went from a daily peak of about 400k the first week, to what we have now at about 120k. [/quote]*facepalm*
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] alex0612 [url=http://majornelson.com/2012/12/13/live-activity-for-week-of-dec-3/]I'm really not surprised[/url]. I have no damn idea why people judged this game by it's daily peak when Halo: Reach was still getting 600,000 players a day back in March.[/quote] No it wasn't. I was there.
-
Yay, Good for Halo 4 Cant wait to play it again. So a great game
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] iTWi2Tid It's funny how it's proven #2 in activity and people are still trying to hate and argue about it![/quote] Well it is sad that the game went from a daily peak of about 400k the first week, to what we have now at about 120k.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Painis Cupcake No, seriously. I want to know dat info.[/quote] Here you go from 2007 onward, just click around. But Halo 3 always had a 24h counter as far as i know. [url]http://web-beta.archive.org/web/20070101000000*/http://www.bungie.net/online/default.aspx [/url] [Edited on 12.13.2012 1:33 PM PST]
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Sanyo93 I'm impressed that Skyrim is #7 a year after release. [/quote]Especially being that it's a single-player game, and games now revolve all around multiplayer (or at least a [b]large[/b] portion of them do).
-
[url=http://web.archive.org/web/20080205191422/http://www.bungie.net/default.aspx]First Link. Feb 8th, 2008. Look to the left and keep scrolling down.[/url] More incoming.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] What Is This1 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] alex0612 What? Peak just encourages dumb people to ramble "DIS GAM ARE DYING BECAUSE IT ONLY GET 100,000 PLAYER EVERY HOUR". Peak is incredible unimportant for determining a game's online "health".[/quote] Not really since overall activity is roughly the same as the peak amount of people it is just an easier way to measure how many people play the game. The main reason they are for the most part the same is overall activity is affected by the peak since the higher the peak the more people playing the game.[/quote]I'm not even going to try to argue about [i]this[/i]. It's mainly just opinion based.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] alex0612 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] What Is This1 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] alex0612 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] lime013 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] alex0612 Halo: Reach was still getting 600,000 players [b][i][u]a day[/u][/i][/b] back in March.[/quote]It did?[/quote] a day= 24 hour period. Why would anyone care about the peak?[/quote] Simple higher peak means there are more people playing the game.[/quote]By that logic Halo 3 was bad it's peaks were barely any better. Proof if you need me to. I have my links primed and ready.[/quote]FIRE THE LINKS!! No, seriously. I want to know dat info.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] alex0612 By that logic Halo 3 was bad it's peaks were barely any better. Proof if you need me to. I have my links primed and ready.[/quote] Huh? Halo 3 peaked at like 200-300k every day for 3 year. As for proof that is too hard to do on a phone.
-
It's funny how it's proven #2 in activity and people are still trying to hate and argue about it!
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] alex0612 What? Peak just encourages dumb people to ramble "DIS GAM ARE DYING BECAUSE IT ONLY GET 100,000 PLAYER EVERY HOUR". Peak is incredible unimportant for determining a game's online "health".[/quote] Not really since overall activity is roughly the same as the peak amount of people it is just an easier way to measure how many people play the game. The main reason they are for the most part the same is overall activity is affected by the peak since the higher the peak the more people playing the game.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] What Is This1 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] alex0612 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] lime013 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] alex0612 Halo: Reach was still getting 600,000 players [b][i][u]a day[/u][/i][/b] back in March.[/quote]It did?[/quote] a day= 24 hour period. Why would anyone care about the peak?[/quote] Simple higher peak means there are more people playing the game.[/quote] That's sweet logic bro.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] Mythical Wolf I swear that list is fixed.[/quote] I swear that's about as dumb as saying BRIBE when halo 4 got good review scores.
-
[quote][b]Posted by:[/b] What Is This1 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] alex0612 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] lime013 [quote][b]Posted by:[/b] alex0612 Halo: Reach was still getting 600,000 players [b][i][u]a day[/u][/i][/b] back in March.[/quote]It did?[/quote] a day= 24 hour period. Why would anyone care about the peak?[/quote] Simple higher peak means there are more people playing the game.[/quote]By that logic Halo 3 was bad it's peaks were barely any better. Proof if you need me to. I have my links primed and ready.
